Black & white photo of VC Morris Gift Shop

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Black & white photo of VC Morris Gift Shop

Post by DavidC »

Black & white photo of VC Morris Gift Shop

I've always enjoyed this photograph of the VC Morris gift Shop. Couple of things:

Anyone know who the photographer was? And, about when it might date from?

Also, if you look at the entryway there are two sets of lights on the ground - one semi-circular and one inside of that. It doesn't look like they are reflections from elswhere. Is it possible that there were/are lights set into the concrete entryway?


David
Duncan
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:05 pm

Post by Duncan »

Yes there were originally up lights in the pavement. They undoubtedly met the fate of many lights in the pavement: water leaks. There is currently colored concrete in that area. It's the old landscape design technique of turning the eye and the feet into the entrance.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

In essence, the photo presents a combined day/night view of the building. At night one wouldn't see the texture of the broad field of plain brickwork; one wouldn't see that surface at all. It's been floodlighted for the photograph . . .

Commercial work like this (re)building provides the architect with an opportunity for something close to stage-set design -- and Mr Wright takes full advantage of the opportunity, in his own special way. (Almost) never a minimalist -- despite his statement that "Five lines where three are enough is always stupidity" (p 144, "Simplicity") -- Wright here moves close to the limit, while vacuuming up everything from Richardson to Bel Geddes:




Image


Image
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

This uncredited 1949 photo, from the collection of the Royal Institute of British Architects, was perhaps made to demonstrate Wright's subtle contextualism . . .

Why else would the photographer have taken the trouble to include the street elevator in his image ?


Image


Image


The car is a '39 Plymouth.

SDR
SREcklund
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:24 pm
Location: Redondo Beach, CA

Re: Black & white photo of VC Morris Gift Shop

Post by SREcklund »

DavidC wrote:Black & white photo of VC Morris Gift ShopAnyone know who the photographer was? And, about when it might date from?

It appears to pre-date the installation of the red tile ...
Docent, Hollyhock House - Hollywood, CA
Humble student of the Master

"Youth is a circumstance you can't do anything about. The trick is to grow up without getting old." - Frank Lloyd Wright
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

http://www.steinerag.com/flw/Artifact%2 ... htm#Morris

"An American Architecture," Kaufmann/Wright, 1955, p 20. Photographer, Maynard L Parker

https://leftoverlondon.wordpress.com/tag/vc-morris/

Google is so great. It helps to have the relevant document in-house . . .

SDR
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Googling "V C Morris publications" very quickly leads to this:

http://www.oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/1 ... tire_text/

. . . a resource of which I was ignorant. The "celebratory brochure" of 1948-9 might be found in the Bill Schmidt collection . . .? I have never seen it, and I don't find it in The Wright Library (steinrag.com).


I've seen photos in which almost all of the lights in the vertical array at the left of the V C Morris facade are operating. Other photos show a broken brick in that array -- at a surprisingly early date ?

SDR
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

From the steinrag page linked above.


Image


I wonder who is responsible for the nearly giddy description. Does it sound like Mr Wright ? Olgivanna ? Franklin Pangborn ?

SDR
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

The spacial design is rather clever, isn't it -- the space expanding as it rises, hidden spaces of the ground floor giving way to the perimeter promenade above. Note that the wares displayed at the very top are visible from the moment one enters . . .

Image Image
JChoate
Posts: 1004
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2016 4:29 pm
Location: Atlanta
Contact:

Post by JChoate »

SDR, you live in San Francisco so do you see this building often? Do you know it like the back of your hand?

I went to SF on my honeymoon in the 1980's. I remember the Morris shop as a great space with a nice entrance. (I recall walking just around the corner and seeing the small sign for the entrance to Aaron Green's office. I went in and up the stairs but lost the nerve to go in, having no plausible reason for being there.)

Do you have any particular experiences with the building since it's on your turf?
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I've been in the building twice, I believe. It's not a magnet for me.

I'm more of an armchair architectural tourist, I'm afraid. Who knows how many wonders and revelations I've missed -- but my structural visualization is well developed, and I generally prefer the perfection of architecture on the page rather than in the flesh. When I visit a building I am more apt to be distracted by what's wrong than inspired by what's right . . .

SDR
Rood
Posts: 1260
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:19 pm
Location: Goodyear, AZ 85338

Post by Rood »

SDR wrote:I've been in the building twice, I believe. It's not a magnet for me.

I'm more of an armchair architectural tourist, I'm afraid. Who knows how many wonders and revelations I've missed -- but my structural visualization is well developed, and I generally prefer the perfection of architecture on the page rather than in the flesh. When I visit a building I am more apt to be distracted by what's wrong than inspired by what's right . . . SDR
OH, my 7 year-old nephew loved the place. Once inside he ran up the ramp, then, pell-mell, down again. To control him I had to carry him around on my shoulders. He loved that, too!
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Visiting the city for a week in 1976, I carried my camera into the store on Maiden Lane. Part-way up the ramp I prepared to take my first photo, when a store employee asked me not to do so. I should probably have asked first, in any event.

I recall being able to see past Wright's ceiling development to the old steel trusses and the skylight . . .

SDR
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

The small, circular space on the ground floor, NW corner, is interesting. The ceiling, a dome, was finished with gold leaf which, when I visited in the 70s, had turned a copper-like patina shade. If you stand in the space and speak, the acoustics will make your head spin; seated (as the space was intended to be used), the acoustics are perfect.

The glimpse of the original structure visible around the edges of the plastic ceiling decoration seems almost a deliberate thing on FLW's part, as if to show that it is indeed a remodeling.

Morris' only design flaw, if it can be called such, is that it is limited in what sort of merchandise works in the building. The long-gone dress shop did not work well. Its original function was a perfect use. As a place to display sculpture, it would also be excellent. Or perhaps greenery? Even empty.
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

Post Reply