Page 10 of 14
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:38 am
by DavidC
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 10:01 am
by SDR
Can anyone think of a reason for the present builders to have spread mulch (?) on the roofs of the house ?
The free-curve approach path isn't, perhaps, quite "Wright" -- but the site seems most pleasant. The reconstruction will be a wonderful gift to Wrightdom when complete.
SDR
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 11:41 am
by RonMcCrea
I'd guess the curved approach is to make the grade easier for visitors with wheelchairs or limited mobility. It's interesting that the approach is correctly to the non-curb=appeal "back" (street-facing side) of the house, with the little entrance per Wright, allowing for the surprise inside.
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:05 pm
by Paul Ringstrom
That might be gravel on the roof not mulch, which is not uncommon on flat roofs.
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 4:09 pm
by SDR
Indeed -- but it's unlike most roof gravel I've seen, in color and texture, it is kept well away from the perimeter -- and most of all, the house doesn't appear ready for final finish material. I can't readily think of what else it might be, however . . .
SDR
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 2:12 pm
by Roderick Grant
Until we see goats grazing on the roof....
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 2:23 pm
by SDR
It is possible to negotiate a grade change using any combination of plan forms -- right angles, 45 or 60-degree angles, arcs, etc . . .
I suppose the approach to the house's "street elevation" echoes the original orientation ? What's missing, apparently, is the automotive accommodation.
SDR
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 2:40 pm
by Roderick Grant
I agree, SDR, the curved walk is unfortunate and so obviously wrong for a FLW design. They should have done more research, or at least asked Tarantino.
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:20 pm
by Paul Ringstrom
The curved path does not resemble the original approach:
http://www.bing.com/mapspreview?FORM=Z9LH2&signedup=1
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:06 pm
by SDR
Not getting that one, Paul.
Has something changed at Google Earth ? I can't seem to navigate (NSEW) from the cited location.
SDR
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 4:11 pm
by RonMcCrea
Your faithful reporter has the answer to the question of the stuff on the roof. I wrote to Scott Eccleston, the project supervisor, and he replied:
The ballast material was a chocolate gravel that we later rejected. The TPO will be the final surface.
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2015 5:58 pm
by SDR
Thanks, Ron.
http://firestonebpco.com/roofing/tpo-roofing-systems/
Now, is that a picture of the Firestone TPO factory -- or a picture of a factory with TPO roofing ?
(One is reminded of the car with "factory air conditioning, from our fully factory air conditioned factory . . ." from Firesign Theater.
SDR
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:11 pm
by SDR
Here's a good view of the entry condition at the Wilson house in its original location . . .
photo © Dave Anderson
TPO roof of new Bachman Wilson
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:39 pm
by ZacharyMatthews
Hopefully this clears up the roofing material debate on Bachman Wilson rebuild.
This photo was taken by me on August 10, 2015, shows the final choice of TPO roofing, the rain scuppers can be seen on the corners of the roof areas. They extend down to copper tubing approx 18" and then 45º another 18" directing water away from the house
Zachary Matthews
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2015 2:56 pm
by DavidC