Architects forgot something here...

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4777
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Architects forgot something here...

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

Former owner of the G. Curtis Yelland House (1910), by Wm. Drummond
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Thank the architects for leaving a convenient pathway for a future elevator -- or glassed-in escalator, for those with time to kill . . . ?


SDR
Rood
Posts: 1260
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:19 pm
Location: Goodyear, AZ 85338

Post by Rood »

Simple solution. Piggy-back two or three elevators, designed to move as a unit, to load and empty two or three floors at the same time.

The photo reminds of a much finer scheme Wes Peters designed for Phoenix, except he planned to suspend the upper floors between three towers. The three towers were planned for a site just south of Piestewa (then Squaw) Peak which was supposed to be connected to the towers by a cable-car. I don't believe plans or elevations were ever published.
peterm
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

Post by peterm »

I like the comment "Rebrand it as a 24 Hour Fitness Center"...
dleach
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:15 am
Location: Fair Oaks, CA

Post by dleach »

Of course, the architects bear the primary responsibility. But, didn't ANYBODY notice the omission? .....beyond belief!
Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4777
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

Peter,
I really like your quote as it directly relates to this particular building: "The space within becomes the reality of the building." and that reality will define its future economic viability.
Former owner of the G. Curtis Yelland House (1910), by Wm. Drummond
peterm
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

Post by peterm »

Ha!..
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I wonder if this debacle is worthy of serious discussion.

The focus, it seems to me, should be possible remedies that would make this pile of material useful as habitation. I repeat that there seems to be an avenue (literally) running up the middle of the thing.

I was struck by a detail in the specs of a generic corporate tower in the late portfolio of Kenzo Tange: in addition to the passenger elevators, a single freight elevator no larger than 4.5 x 8 x 10. I've been on the waiting line for use of such elevators when providing construction services in similar towers . . .

SDR
Post Reply