LEGO FLLW Series - Imperial Hotel

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Macrodex
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:11 pm

LEGO FLLW Series - Imperial Hotel

Post by Macrodex »

A new model is coming out later this year.

Image

http://www.archdaily.com/322152/lego-ar ... ial-hotel/
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

It should be the complete hotel.
Oak Park Jogger
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:21 pm

Post by Oak Park Jogger »

875,000 pieces?
Jeff Myers
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

Roderick, I doubt they could make the full complex. These are designed for desk tops, shelfs, tables. Knowing my collection of most of the series I'm running out of room. I'm glad it's not the full complex. I wonder what Wright designs will they do next? Price Tower, Westhope, Ennis,Miller,Freeman, Jacobs, all that come to mind right now.
JAT
Jeff T
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

It should be the complete hotel, full size.
Macrodex
Posts: 236
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:11 pm

Post by Macrodex »

Jeff Myers wrote:I wonder what Wright designs will they do next? Price Tower, Westhope, Ennis,Miller,Freeman, Jacobs, all that come to mind right now.
I'd love to see Jacobs done; I would, also, like to see another Prairie house -- maybe Willits -- and, for me, the ultimate would be a Hollyhock model; but, that would be quite a large one.
Matt
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:24 am

Post by Matt »

I've thought about a model of the Imperial Hotel, but scale is a bit of a problem. To do the whole building and have any sort of detail, it would have to be a big model. And would there be enough buyers interested in a big model of the hotel? Taller buildings seem to work better at smaller scales. We did Price Tower and are working on Johnson Wax tower now. Compact, two store houses also work well and I'm working on a Bach House model. One-story houses, however, just turn out like pancakes.

Matt
LandmarkModel.com
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Yes -- and:

A major problem, from my point of view, is that the standard Lego pieces do not always comport well with the dimensions -- the module, if you will -- of the particular building in question. The most successful Lego models, from the standpoint of accuracy, are those with the greatest percentage of "custom" Lego parts -- like the Imperial model shown here. Thus, one sees that the Lego system -- or, presumably, any simple building-block toy -- is ill-suited to the replication of (most) known works of architecture, and, as such, should be discouraged, if misrepresentation (and its children, miseducation and disrespect) are seen as harmful.

In other words: WTF. Or don't we care how Mr Wright's work is mangled, as long as publicity of the name is promoted ?

The worst examples of the genre are circular buildings rendered in Lego -- which is, after all, orthogonal to the bone. And how could a 30-60 plan, like so many of Wright's later houses, be adequately (much less beautifully) rendered in this medium ? Does kitsch, or the amusement of the uneducated (children foremost among them) trump real education -- which would be the accurate and lovely demonstration of Wright's art ?

We anguish over the dreadful proportions of a poorly-wrought attempt to recreate Wright on the ground, yet look the other way when atrocities like the Lego Guggenheim are presented. Am I the only one to see a disconnect, here ?


Rant concluded. Thank you.

SDR
Jeff Myers
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

As model maker Adam Reed Tucker states it's his own interpretation of the design, it may not be as accurate.
Yeah I know they should custom design the bricks but that wouldn't be lego code.
JAT
Jeff T
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Right -- therefore, it isn't the right medium for the modeling of buildings of distinction, is it -- unless maybe they're shaped like shoe-boxes ?

My "code" when it comes to Wright, is that it's either Wright, or Wrong !

(It is for work with my own name on it that I devote whatever creativity and originality I can dredge up . . .)

SDR
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Wait, I've got it: a contest, to make building models from unlikely materials.

1. The Illinois Mile-High -- Lincoln Logs

2. The Larkin Administration Building -- Tinkertoy

3. The Guggenheim Museum -- Erector Set

4. The Robie house -- mashed potato

5. The David Wright residence -- unshelled walnuts

6. The Price Tower -- #3 rebar

7. The Jacobs I residence -- peach ice cream

8. Fallingwater -- sand (or whipped cream -- constructor's choice)


Ready, set . . . go !


SDR
Jeff Myers
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

Hahahaha now the Mile High as a lego set could be cool
and maybe it could be a little bigger than the ones they create.
JAT
Jeff T
peterm
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

Post by peterm »

An absurdity from down under which makes The Wright Legos seem accurate:

http://www.australiandesignreview.com/n ... ed-in-lego

Wouldn't the Lego concept be ideal for the Usonian Automatics?
DRN
Posts: 4457
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

SDR: You are not alone, I'll pick up on your rant.
The FllW LEGO sets are poorly proportioned, cartoony in color, lacking relevant detail, and as you noted with the case of the Guggenheim, a true case of a square peg in a round hole. That the FllW Foundation licenses this overpriced crap is evidence of how desperate they are to raise revenue.

One could argue these sets raise awareness of Wright's work, but they aren't Wright's work, rather they are poor (mis)representations of it.

peterm's suggestion of a Usonian Automatic set is probably the one instance where the LEGO system might be relevant, provided LEGO took the time to make blocks to the accurate proportions and made the necessary custom pieces such as window block, coffered block, corner block, etc.
peterm
Posts: 6352
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

Post by peterm »

Car models were fun (and educational), and always much more accurate in their proportions and scale. I remember assembling this one as a kid:

http://www.etsy.com/listing/103965323/j ... -model-car

Classic wrecks! This one even has the "distressed" look, complete with rust spots and much patina!...

Shouldn't there be models made available of Ennis sliding down the hill, sagging cantilevers, insensitive alterations, etc.?
Post Reply