Frank Lloyd Wright's Doghouse

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
ekb
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:30 pm

Wright doghouse

Post by ekb »

SDR My parent's house was to be built in redwood. Aaron Green of FLW's SF office changed it to mahogany. I doubt Mr. Wright ever knew of that. I used to know the reason ,but have forgot. The choice of mahogany has created a slight issue. We have been fixing up the house and 1x8 V rustic mahogany is not available. Mcbeath Lumber in Berkely had some 4/4 x9"x 8' that I had to mill down to finish a part of the carport . It was $27! Can't imagine what the wood in the house would cost today. Eric
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Yesiree. The story is that your mom sold some family china to complete the purchase of that mahogany ?

MacBeath also has a yard in San Francisco. I couldn't tell you where the best place would be to acquire more wood if you needed it. Another source is Handloggers, which moved from Sausalito to Richmond some time back. I too wonder what led Aaron et al to choose mahogany; maybe he had a source at the time ? It's a wonderful choice, of course -- in the abstract, at least !

I moved to San Anselmo in 1980, and had only just heard of John Sergeant's book. A neighbor loaned me his copy, and it was there that I learned I was living in the same town as one of Wright's post-war houses. Imagine my delight ! I soon found my way up the hill; I still recall the familiar thrill when one first catches sight of "the real thing" -- another of Mr Wright's special places. The signature is unmistakable . . .

SDR
flwromanza
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:41 pm

Post by flwromanza »

Come and see Eddie's House!
Our first two screenings of "Romanza" have been scheduled. Sunday, March 25th, 12:30 & 2:30 PM at the Illinois State Museum Thorne Deuel Auditorium
502 S. Spring St., Springfield, Ill. 62706. Admission free. Hope to see you locals there
Though specific dates not yet confirmed, I will also be visiting Florida, Iowa, and Colorado in April (Architecture month). Will update schedule.
KevinW
Posts: 1326
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:41 pm

Post by KevinW »

Gloria would get so upset during the Berger house tour at the 2003 conference when people would keep asking her about the dog house. She finally said to me..."Look at this beautiful house that my husband and I built...and all they want to know is about that dog house!". I remember her also not liking being called cute...(she was quite petite in size), but full of life and outgoing in personality!
KevinW
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I found myself following Mrs Berger and companions during an event at the Marin Civic Center, in the late eighties or early nineties. I didn't know her or her friends and wasn't about to intrude. I did overhear her speak of having replaced some of the hardwood in her home.

When I lived in San Anselmo, I wouldn't have dreamed of calling unannounced at the house. But it was a comfort to know that it was there . . .

SDR
ekb
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:30 pm

Post by ekb »

My sister took my mother to Taliesen for a visit in the late 90's . My sister commented at that time how upset my mother was because people kept wanting to talk about the "damn doghouse"
jim
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by jim »

Under the thread "How many original Wright homeowners are left?" ekb states that the Berger house "will be going on the market soon" (1/29/12). Any plans for a benefit public open house to benefit the FLlW Building Conservancy, as was done with Buehler last summer?
Jim
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

If so, I would certainly take the opportunity to benefit the Conservancy, and to (finally) see the Berger house inside and out !


SDR
ekb
Posts: 34
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:30 pm

Post by ekb »

SDR, Needless to say if you had knocked on the door (as so many people did over the years) when you looked at the house when you lived in San Anselmo my mother would have invited you in. Once I looked at a guide book on FLW houses, in which all the entry's said,basically don't bother the owners, but under Berger House it said "feel free to knock on the door, Mrs. Berger loves visitors"
My sister has talked to Debra Vick who was involved with the Buehler house showing. There are some things that need to be worked out before any descision is made.
flwromanza
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 2:41 pm

Post by flwromanza »

DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

This story is hot ! Here's another notice, appearing today in a post at DesignAddict. Here we find a previously unseen photo of the original doghouse, though it's labeled as being Eric's reconstruction.

http://www.architizer.com/en_us/blog/dy ... -doghouse/

SDR
JimM
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Austin,Texas

Post by JimM »

This may have been posted, but the contemporaneous photos show about 8 shingle courses, while the re-built and Wright's plans indicate about 4 as well as narrower ridge capping. Shingle courses, even for Wright, would be an unlikely specification. In this case I do think the photo depiction is more appealing visually and proportionately than the model/plan. Then again, if seen in context with the house it may look altogether different.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Right. It has taken me a while to absorb that what the brothers Berger had in mind was to produce an example more true to the architect's original specification than was the one actually built by their father. This may or may not have been a good choice, but it is certainly one of the two valid options, and deserved to be explored, I'd say.

I happen to like the earlier example, for the finer scale of the roofing, at least. The "miniaturizing" of that texture, for this miniature building, seems a good choice, no matter how it may have come to be. I also like the door opening extending to the ground, rather than being "punched" into the wall plane (and not aligning necessarily with the siding module, which itself is composed of narrower boards that perhaps better echo the wood used in the house itself ?). Taken altogether, the twin exercises in realizing a Wright design give us a valuable opportunity to explore what these choices mean, and how they affect the appearance of the structure -- as well as how closely they follow Wright's intentions.

And I'm still unclear: was the first house (eventually) built by the boys, or by Dad ?

SDR
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

It's always better to follow the specifications of the architect if the aim is to understand the design that the architect provided. The only reason to follow a different set of standards would be to construct an 'as-built' structure in situ.
Post Reply