Storrer Numbers

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
FarmerBill
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:59 pm
Location: USA

Storrer Numbers

Post by FarmerBill »

Is there a comprehensive and up-to-date list of Storrer numbers online? And are there more recent editions of his Complete Catalog than the 3rd edition (2007) or Companion (revised 2006)?

I'm trying to find the Storrer numbers for the William Heald house in Glen Ellyn, and the James Heald house in River Forest. These are two of Storrer's 29 "newly discovered" (as of 2007 or 2008) Wright houses.

On his website www.franklloydwrightinfo.com he assigns S.204.7 to the Thomas E. Sullivan house in Wilmette, and he assigns S.203.5 and S.203.6 to the houses in Berwyn, but does not give owner names for them. I'm not as interested in the 24 houses on William Street in River Forest.

I don't want to rehash the discussion about whether these 29 houses are legitimate Wright or not, I just want to nail down the details of the two Heald houses and the two houses in Berwyn. I had no luck with internet searches.

Also, it appears that S.122, S.202.1, S.232, and S.413 are unused. Can anyone confirm this? Thank you.
Last edited by FarmerBill on Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

It seems to me, from having followed Bill's work in the past, that he expects people to keep up on his changes on their own. If he changes, adds or deletes entries, he publishes them somewhere, like his old newsletter or the online Update that has replaced it, and assumes everyone has the information. If one were to rifle through his articles over the years, all the current numbers could undoubtedly be found, but that would be arduous, wouldn't it?
Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4777
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

2006 is the more recent edition of the Companion

http://www.amazon.com/Frank-Lloyd-Wrigh ... t_ep_dpt_1
pharding
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois
Contact:

Post by pharding »

The Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy reviewed some of the houses and the consensus was that it is a hoax. No one else has drunk the Storer Kool-Aid on his goofy claims. I personally have been in 2 of these houses. The two that I toured were clearly not FLW Houses.
Paul Harding FAIA Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, 1941 Lloyd Lewis House, 1952 Glore House | www.harding.com | LinkedIn
jmcnally
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:23 am

Storrer numbers

Post by jmcnally »

not sure if these help - from earlier edition of the book:
S.232 was the Fallingwater guesthouse alterations
S.122 was Gridley Barn (demolished) in Batavia IL
S.413 was McBean in Rochester MN (Erdman prefab #2) - if I recall, all the prefabs were regrouped into a single number with decimal .1, .2, etc.
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

Careful of spelling, Paul. "Storer" is the name of the man who built the Storer House. Bill's name has double 'r', "Storrer." He gets out of sorts if his name is misspelled.
FarmerBill
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:59 pm
Location: USA

Post by FarmerBill »

Thank you jmcnally.

It appears that Rudin is now S.412.1 and McBean is S.412.2 (both Erdman Prefab #2s). The Erdman Prefab #1s are a mishmash of Storrer numbers, from Van Tamelen (S.406) to Lafond (S.411.2).

I assume S.232 for the Fallingwater guesthouse alterations refers to the visitors' theater that was created by enclosing 3 of the 4 carports underneath the servants' quarters. In 1947 a servants' sitting room was built off the kitchen, under Kaufmann Sr.'s terrace, but there does not appear to be a Storrer number for that project.

I never thought I would care about Storrer numbers, but his system is the definitive method of identification. For me it marks my official entry (descent?) into Wright geekdom. If only there was an updated list on his website.
jmcnally
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:23 am

Post by jmcnally »

Unfortunately, as new editions of the books are published, there is no explanation for deleted numbers. I conversed a year or two ago with Prof. Storrer and included his explanations with some of the listings ("former S.__") on the website www.flwright.us. I have found his numbering system to be an excellent common reference piece, and I take his book with me when I travel.

I believe he is relying on floor plans more heavily in recent years, leading him to remove or add attributions to Wright. Since I am an exterior guy and do not have access to Taliesen records, I am in no position to dispute his research. I look forward to more information about why the William Street houses are suspect. I'll admit I was shocked to hear that they were being considered legit - it's hard to believe an entire neighborhood could have remained under the radar for so long.
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

Is Storrer's numbering really 'the definitive' system as suggested? Many people use the numbering system used by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation and its Wright archives. It combines both the year of the commission and the sequential number of the commission for that year.

Mark Hertzberg
Mark Hertzberg
FarmerBill
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 9:59 pm
Location: USA

Post by FarmerBill »

I didn't know the Foundation had its own numbering system, although it certainly makes sense. Is there an online or published resource containing all their Wright listings? I don't see one on their website.
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

I do not have the Monograph, but I believe that this is the numbering system used in the Monograph. It may also be in Tom Heinz' Field Guide. I believe that the Storrer numbering system groups Wright's work by characteristics, among other things. The official archive system is simpler: Year of the work, and number of the project from that year.

Mark Hertzberg
Mark Hertzberg
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

The Foundations' is also the system used in the new "Complete Works" books.


David
george nichols
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:41 am
Location: Huntington Beach,Ca

T*** numbering system.

Post by george nichols »

An explanation of the numbering system is contained in the introduction to "An Index to the Taliesin Correspondence".

G.N.
george nichols
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:41 am
Location: Huntington Beach,Ca

T****

Post by george nichols »

Forgive my not mentioning in my previous post that also there are two lists,alpha and numerical,that list all of Wright's work,built and unbuilt,each over 20 pages.

G.N.
Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4777
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

Title Frank Lloyd Wright, an index to the Taliesin correspondence: Chronological index, 1947-1965, Volume 2
Editor Anthony Alofsin
Publisher Garland, 1988
Length 864 pages

I can't find anyone selling this book on the internet.
Post Reply