Broad Museum design unveiled (a giant perf...?)
Broad Museum design unveiled (a giant perf...?)
Diller, Scofidio + Renfro architects call it a veil:
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/ne ... 5323.story
It seems like the architects are asking the more legitimate question, "is it bold enough?"
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2 ... think.html
The location of the museum next to Gehry's Disney Center:
http://zev.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uplo ... m-5501.jpg
The artist tells the truth about Broad:
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2010/ ... r_broa.php
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/ne ... 5323.story
It seems like the architects are asking the more legitimate question, "is it bold enough?"
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2 ... think.html
The location of the museum next to Gehry's Disney Center:
http://zev.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uplo ... m-5501.jpg
The artist tells the truth about Broad:
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2010/ ... r_broa.php
-
Roderick Grant
- Posts: 11815
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am
Too bad -- considering that the same architects are being roundly congratulated for their relatively subtle and highly effective improvements of parts of the Lincoln Center cultural complex in New York . . .
The first of Peter's linked pieces makes clear that the design has been compromised already -- and that it may still evolve before it's done.
A recent New Yorker profile of Eli Broad (rhymes with towed) makes clear what a control freak he has been, repeatedly trading his financial support of the visual arts community with strings that place him in the (highly visible) drivers' seat.
S
The first of Peter's linked pieces makes clear that the design has been compromised already -- and that it may still evolve before it's done.
A recent New Yorker profile of Eli Broad (rhymes with towed) makes clear what a control freak he has been, repeatedly trading his financial support of the visual arts community with strings that place him in the (highly visible) drivers' seat.
S
We might want to reserve some of our judgement until we have an idea of the space within. It's maddening that there are no interior renderings which could give us an idea what the viewer might experience.
I wonder about some practical issues: how will they keep the cubicles clean with that bright white color and the infamous L.A. soot and smog, what about pigeons nesting in the handy little birdhouses? Earlier drawings showed a green roof... is that still in the mix?
I wonder about some practical issues: how will they keep the cubicles clean with that bright white color and the infamous L.A. soot and smog, what about pigeons nesting in the handy little birdhouses? Earlier drawings showed a green roof... is that still in the mix?
-
Jeff Myers
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
- Location: Tulsa
- Contact:
I'm not a fan of screens in general. It's a popular trend in architecture and to me is seems like a veil covering an old hag...trying to dress up something that isn't attractive. Pugh Scarpa, a firm here in LA, does a lot of screens. They are a cheap way of dressing up otherwise boring buildings.
Deke
Deke
Well, Robert Venturi coined the term "decorated shed", but maybe this is more than that.
Here's the latest leak, a drive by, fly through:
http://broadartfoundation.org/press/Bro ... hrough.mov
Intriguing and entertaining, but I'm not so sure about the escalator "colonoscopy"... Is the upper floor open to the elements, or glassed in?
The whole thing has a Saarinen TWA Terminal feel to it. The art museum as a communal gathering place to escape and take flight?
Here's the latest leak, a drive by, fly through:
http://broadartfoundation.org/press/Bro ... hrough.mov
Intriguing and entertaining, but I'm not so sure about the escalator "colonoscopy"... Is the upper floor open to the elements, or glassed in?
The whole thing has a Saarinen TWA Terminal feel to it. The art museum as a communal gathering place to escape and take flight?
Hmm -- never saw a drive-by video like that -- good idea. I'd be happier with the exterior if the envelope didn't have those two unrelated "graphic distortions" centered on the two most obvious faces. The interior is largely a mystery; is the top floor a convention/party space ? An open-air sculpture garden ? And what are the blue cubes two floors below -- art storage ? Offices ? An anachronistic super-computer ? It would have been so easy to display some visual hints . . .
Anyway, thanks for the look.
S
Anyway, thanks for the look.
S
From a previously-linked article:
"Lead architect Elizabeth Diller's term for it is "the veil," because it enables the museum to relate to its surroundings by providing slots through which visitors can look out on Grand Avenue, and passersby outside the museum can get glimpses of what's inside. Visitors will enter the museum at ground level, take an escalator bathed in natural light to the top-floor galleries, and return via a staircase from which they'll have views into what she has dubbed "the vault" — the storage facility on the first and second floor that will house all the art from the 2,000-work collection that's not on display or on loan to other museums."
"Lead architect Elizabeth Diller's term for it is "the veil," because it enables the museum to relate to its surroundings by providing slots through which visitors can look out on Grand Avenue, and passersby outside the museum can get glimpses of what's inside. Visitors will enter the museum at ground level, take an escalator bathed in natural light to the top-floor galleries, and return via a staircase from which they'll have views into what she has dubbed "the vault" — the storage facility on the first and second floor that will house all the art from the 2,000-work collection that's not on display or on loan to other museums."
