Page 11 of 18

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2023 2:26 pm
by DRN
In case some of us Chatters didn’t view the video David linked:

https://savewright.org/video-what-its-l ... ler-house/

It is well worth a look. The current owners have accomplished the Herculean task of stripping off all of the exterior paint that has distracted many a Wrightian eye when viewing recent pics of the house.

I’d hope after all of the negative comments about the state of the exterior, we might laud the effort made.

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2023 8:28 pm
by SDR
Absolutely---a minor miracle of sensitive preservation. Instead of paint, a stain was used to bring the wood to a uniform appearance much closer to what one expects Wright to have intended in terms of texture and the revelation of the grain of the wood. The time and labor necessary to accomplish what we see might have been onerous---but the result is surely worth the effort.

There are a couple of shots in the video of the house when freshly stripped and before the stain was applied. Sanding and staining of an unpainted Usonian exterior should be explored by any owner, as an alternative to paint and perhaps to the clear finishes some are using. Film finishes are problematic in cases where seasonal wood movement is likely to separate the finish from the wood. While periodic re-staining might be necessary to maintain the appearance we see in the video, it seems likely that this would be less troublesome and costly than removal and re-application of a film finish.

S

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2023 7:27 pm
by DRN
The craftspeople that accomplished the refinishing at the G-W house used citrus based stripping chemicals with some light sanding. The finish is a stain from the TWP line. A great benefit of the TWP product is that it does not require sanding in the future for reapplication, as the Sikkens products do.

Finish conservator Pam Kirschner’s work at the Pope House was referenced. An FLWBC article tells much of that process:
https://savewright.org/materials-for-re ... hey-house/

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2023 8:39 pm
by SDR
Thanks for that, Dan. The contents of the Conservancy article (and very timely update) should be read as a substitution/corrective to what I wrote above. Any process that obviates the need for sanding is to be applauded. It appears that the "stain" I referred to would be the pigments added to protect the wood from UV exposure and not as a color choice in and of itself ?

S

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2023 7:49 am
by DRN
That is my understanding.

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:41 am
by peterm
For sale again:
https://savewright.org/building/goetsch-winckler-house/

https://savewright.org/wright-on-the-ma ... -for-sale/

Improvements: The paint has been removed to reveal the redwood siding.

Unfortunate changes: The original bathroom fixtures have been replaced.

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:31 am
by blase
Hi all, a dream come true for me — my wife and I are the new owners and very lucky careful caretakers of the Goetsch–Winckler house. What a tremendous honor and privilege it is to steward such a beautiful work of art. :)

It took some time to get this account activated, so if you're a member of some of the popular Wright Facebook fangroups, you may have already seen my introductory post. I will use WrightChat primarily to discuss the finer details of the restoration, and leave social media up to promoting the end results and sharing photos along the way.

Here's where things with the home stand right now:

1. Condition. Structurally and cosmetically, all pretty good. Roof is in great shape. Plumbing is in good shape, if not just old. In-floor heating is working like a charm. The interior wood in the home is in OK shape, but it's also been through 84 years of occupancy, so one has to manage expectations here. The concrete floor has chipped in a number of places, but these should be able to be repaired. Everything is very dusty and likely has not had a deep clean in many years.

2. Paint. As others have mentioned, yes the paint around the house has been removed by the previous owner (at great expense), but this work is not entirely complete. The roof line above the alcove and the walls around the lanai area (including the inner lanai wall itself) will all still need to be stripped. My wife and I will start working on this in a few months when the weather is more amenable.

3. Bathroom fixtures. Although the home remains largely unbesmirched despite its age, the bathroom was indeed updated with modern fixtures last year. Although this was approved by the conservancy, I don't believe the update was necessary and, to me, does not maintain the architectural character of the home. Fortunately, I found the original fixtures in the basement (underneath the carport). We will clean them up and reinstall them back to their rightful place, then reglaze the bathtub from the new white back to its original color to match.

4. Lanai. The artificial turf in the lanai will be removed come spring, and we'll either replace with real grass, or possibly infill with Cherokee red concrete blocks, as has been done in the past (and looked pretty good!). We spoke to a couple landscapers who've worked on the property in previous years, and they mentioned that real grass does come with a few caveats. Apparently, the sun can reflect off the glazings on the Southern wall in the lanai in just the right way to burn the grass. There is also of course no easy access into the lanai from the outside, which makes mowing challenging. In any event, artificial turf has no business here! Previous owner also rebuilt the Western and Northern walls of the lanai (as well as patched the carport retaining wall), as there were boards that had rotted. Due to difficult in sourcing long redwood planks as would be required for this job, cypress was used instead.

5. Driveway. The red gravel on the driveway was also swapped out with a gray gravel to match the larger stones which line the planters. We plan on changing this back, but this is a low priority, luxury item on our list.

6. Landscaping. Over the years, the property has become increasingly "over-landscaped" and no longer feels "within" nature, and instead sits lonely on a grass lot with little to no organic growth. We have some ideas to ameliorate this, but no plans have been made. All I can say is that it's on our mind.

7. Pests. On the inside, there was a pretty bad carpenter ant issue at the Western-most end of the gallery hall, but we found where they were getting in, and where their outlet was on the inside of the home. Yesterday we baited the area and the ants quickly took to it. I am confident the colony will be dead when we return next weekend. There does not appear to be any other sort of pests or rodents in the home, but that's of course what they want you to think :)

8. Screens. The screens are also in pretty bad shape. I'm told by the previous owner (who did not live at the home) that the occupant's dog did a number on them, particularly the screens along the French doors on the North side of the home. My wife and I will probably begin restoring those in a week or two.

9. Future plans. Lastly, this is not our primary residence. We already live in a lovely home designed by architect Francis E. "Red" Warner (a student of a student of Wright's) an hour or so North in Midland. So — big news! — when it's ready, we plan to open the home for overnight stays, as other Wright owners have graciously done. We hope that in doing so we can provide others with the opportunity to experience a rare slice of Frank Lloyd Wright’s vision for Usonia, while also subsidizing the very real and inevitable costs associated with preserving such a unique structure. This has not yet been announced widely, but I wanted to let WrightChat be the first to know. When ready, the news will be accompanied by a website and (hopefully!) some press coverage.

Thanks for reading, and I'm so happy to be a part of the community. I'll continue to post in this topic as we make progress or are in need of advice. Cheers! :D

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 6:53 pm
by Tom
YEEEHAAA!
Welcome aboard.
Thrilled that G/W will be opened up.
You might find some volunteers here to help you labor.

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:07 pm
by SDR
Welcome, indeed, blase ! Thanks for thinking of us, and for keeping us abreast of this good news. As this treasure---among other things, one of Wright's most beautiful plans as a graphic composition, and as exciting as Jacobs, Pauson, Pew or Sturges---is so dear to our hearts, we will feel tremendous relief to know that the right stewards have now arrived to rescue, renew and maintain her. Bravo !

SDR

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:23 pm
by peterm
Welcome!

I’m so happy that you have decided to bring that bathroom back! I was disappointed when I saw photos of the “update”, and being the purist that I am, was hoping that those fixtures hadn’t been thrown out.

You have purchased one of the finest and most important houses in Wright’s entire oeuvre. After reading your assessment, I’m confident that it’s in good hands.

Congratulations!

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 9:40 am
by blase
peterm wrote: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:23 pm You have purchased one of the finest and most important houses in Wright’s entire oeuvre.
You're not the first person I've heard that from, and I'm curious what, in your opinion, makes this home as important as you and others have said?

---

From here on out, I will post periodic updates and progress photos on the various aspects of restoration and preservation to serve as a visual record.

Update Jan 16, 2024
  • Two screen doors (#3 and #9) have been re-screened and reinstalled. As noted previously, the majority of the screens in the home are in need of replacement. We plan to tackle at least two screen doors each weekend visit and, within a month or two, the entire house will have been re-screened.

    Image
    Above: Floorplan of Goetsch–Winckler house indicating door numbers. These numbers are written on the inside of the screen assembly by the craftsman who originally constructed them. Note that the floorplan above does not indicate where the doors are actually located in the built home (see doors 1, 2, 11, and 12).

    Image
    Above: Screen door #9 with damaged screen evident. When we took ownership of the property, this door was off the hinges, as shown.

    Image
    Above: Screen door #9 re-screened, ready to be reinstalled.
  • Lots of cleaning, dusting, and mopping. Vacuumed all screens that are in decent shape.

    Image
    Above: All the chairs in the home had a thin layer of dust and the undersides were filled with cobwebs. I'm trying to decide whether or not to remove the aftermarker felt sliders. We removed them from one chair as a test.

    Image
    Above: Alcove area getting a thorough clean. There was lots of dog hair embedded in the sofa, and a mouse had made a nest underneath the sofa at one point. This has been cleaned out and any mouse-sized holes plugged with steel wool.

    Image
    Above: There is a tear in one of the sofa panels. Fortunately, we found leftover upholstery stock in one of the storage cabinets. We will send this out to have that panel replaced. (About 12"x10")

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 10:00 am
by Roderick Grant
The previous owner, she who painted the house, seemed so enthusiastic about restoring it. Glad to see it in better hands.
And, yes, Goetsch-Winckler is near the top of FLW's work. Why? A book could be written to cover the subject, but it can be summed up in the famous Latin phrase, "Reductio ad Perfectum!"

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 11:18 am
by blase
Roderick Grant wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 10:00 am The previous owner, she who painted the house, seemed so enthusiastic about restoring it. Glad to see it in better hands.
And, yes, Goetsch-Winckler is near the top of FLW's work. Why? A book could be written to cover the subject, but it can be summed up in the famous Latin phrase, "Reductio ad Perfectum!"
Perhaps not a book, but a treatise was certainly written on the home. As referenced in earlier replies in this thread, a special issue of The Kresge Art Museum Bulletin was published and distributed by Michigan State University titled Affordable Dreams: The Goetsch-Winckler House and Frank Lloyd Wright.

Maybe some of the credit is owed to Goetsch and Winckler rather than just to Wright. The pair made two key decisions which simplified the design, albeit in the name of cost. Excerpted below:
The embodiment of Wright's Usonian ideal, the Goetsch-Winckler house epitomized his concern for giving innate new form to the simplified enveloping core of interior dwelling space. No other Usonian house achieved such a dramatic, unencumbered sense of floating ceilings: the dramatic effect obtained from having the continuous, unobstructed roof plane over the taller central living/studio area appear somehow to be hovering weightlessly over—for it surely cannot be supported by—the continuous, transparent band of clerestory windows that rings the upper edge of the entire space and dies into the brick mass of the fireplace. [...]

Significantly, the uncompromising clarity of this dramatic effect proved the fortuitous result of two modifications that were prompted by the need to cut building costs, but which yielded important and unexpected dividends in terms of a seminal streamlining and simplification. The first modification involved the substitution of flush surface-mounted four-foot-square oiled plywood panels for the redwood "board ceiling" originally specified by Wright (and employed, for example, in the Loren Pope house of 1939 in Falls Church, Virginia). Although the narrow ceiling boards are also flush mounted, their V-groove joints produce a busy linear pattern that would hand tended to dilute the impact and significance of the panel ceiling's dynamic planar aspect.

The second modification entailed elimination of the "perforated boards" (or "shadow screens," as they were sometimes called) from all clerestory windows in the house (plate 11). Their elimination had the salutary effect of transforming the architectural character of the clerestory windows from one of perceptually ambiguous semiopaque decorative screen to that of a wholly transparent and perceptually lucid continuous band of glass, thereby acting to dematerialize what may effectively be read a as continuous transparent frieze nestled beneath the boldly projecting tripled-tiered eaves.

The resulting effect was not unlike the one obtained at the Rosenbaum house (1939) in Florence, Alabama. However, the Rosenbaum house lacked the Goetsch-Winckler house's unifying distillation of the "central room" idea; the force of both its central space and overall mass was diluted by secondary protuberances. Although the resulting manipulation of floatig roof and wall planes of the Goetsch-Winckler house may resemble the composition of Mies van der Rohe's Barcelona Pavilion (1929), the essentials of the interior space are very much Wright's own.
Ultimately, Goetsch and Winckler landed just $5 under their $6,600 budget ($150k in today's money).

Regarding the shadow screens, I have not seen this mentioned previously, and Plate 11 has never been shared in this thread. Below, you can see a portion of Plate 11, with planned "squares and crosses" shadow screen design present. Very interesting to see, and to imagine how different the home would feel with them.

Image

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 12:54 pm
by Tom
Thanks for the posts blase.
Will be following closely - thanks again.
Looks like the vertical brick joints are the same as horizontal ones - is that right?

Re: Goetsch-Winckler Usonian house

Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2024 12:57 pm
by blase
Tom wrote: Tue Jan 16, 2024 12:54 pm Thanks for the posts blase.
Will be following closely - thanks again.
Looks like the vertical brick joints are the same as horizontal ones - is that right?
They are to my untrained eye, yes.