The January 1938 Architectural Forum Frank Lloyd Wright

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
broadacrecity
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:46 am

The January 1938 Architectural Forum Frank Lloyd Wright

Post by broadacrecity »

Enjoy!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/42933860@N ... 667179670/
Top
Deke
Posts: 692
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:18 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:
Contact Deke

Post by Deke »

Thanks for posting, but this does strain the fair use doctrine.
Top
rightwaswright
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The January 1938 Architectural Forum Frank Lloyd Wright

Post by rightwaswright »

God bless you!!
Top
JSL
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:13 pm

Post by JSL »

This doesn't "strain" the fair use doctrine, this is outright copyright theft. Hopefully flickr will delete this information.
Jack in KY

libertymutualsux at gmail dot com
Top
egads
Posts: 892
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:42 am
Location: Long Beach CA

Post by egads »

Yea, we should all have to buy a copy. Oh wait we can't.
Top
Jeff Myers
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:
Contact Jeff Myers

Post by Jeff Myers »

Actually maybe there are a few parts that are not copied, just hinting.
I think my work might have a copy of it but I don't know.
JAT
Jeff T
Top
JSL
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:13 pm

Post by JSL »

egads wrote:Yea, we should all have to buy a copy. Oh wait we can't.
Sure you can. They come on ebay frequently. And just because you can't buy something doesn't mean you can steal it.
Jack in KY

libertymutualsux at gmail dot com
Top
JSL
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:13 pm

Post by JSL »

egads wrote:Yea, we should all have to buy a copy. Oh wait we can't.
Here ya go:

ebay item #250583347541

Here's another one"

ebay item #360235237582

So, yes, you can go out and buy a copy. I'm not saying they are cheap, but they are legal.
Jack in KY

libertymutualsux at gmail dot com
Top
rightwaswright
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 11:18 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Post by rightwaswright »

JSL wrote:This doesn't "strain" the fair use doctrine, this is outright copyright theft. Hopefully flickr will delete this information.
Too late, I already downloaded the pages. Haha.
Top
JSL
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:13 pm

Post by JSL »

Joke's on you...a BUNCH of pages missing. HA HA HA
Jack in KY

libertymutualsux at gmail dot com
Top
dkottum
Posts: 432
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:52 pm
Location: Battle Lake, MN

Post by dkottum »

I cannot imagine why someone would participate in a discussion forum in this manner.
Top
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I believe this is the poster's "signature issue" -- which study of past posts will verify.

Copyright may or may not cover a 1938 magazine. Perhaps we could start by verifying that ?

SDR
Top
pharding
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois
Contact:
Contact pharding

Post by pharding »

JSL wrote:This doesn't "strain" the fair use doctrine, this is outright copyright theft. Hopefully flickr will delete this information.
The copyright has expired.
Paul Harding FAIA Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, 1941 Lloyd Lewis House, 1952 Glore House | www.harding.com | LinkedIn
Top
pharding
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois
Contact:
Contact pharding

Post by pharding »

JSL wrote:Joke's on you...a BUNCH of pages missing. HA HA HA
Correct. There are pages missing, including the real cover of the magazine and the Fallingwater fold out photograph by Hedrich Blessing.

This is a great publication of FLW's work and is highly recommended. Basically FLW was the editor of this issue. There was such an out pouring of acclaim by architects for Fallingwater, even though it was buried in the middle of the monograph/special edition of the magazine, that it was launched on its trajectory to international fame.
Paul Harding FAIA Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, 1941 Lloyd Lewis House, 1952 Glore House | www.harding.com | LinkedIn
Top
Jeff Myers
Posts: 1813
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:
Contact Jeff Myers

Post by Jeff Myers »

I believe PHarding is correct for one you are not breaking law if you have just part of the publication up, second copyright is expired, as I have seen many have already at my work in many publications.
JAT
Jeff T
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Click Here for General Discussion Posts”