Dana Sconces and Auldbrass Chair at Auction

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Frankie-Oh
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 10:42 pm
Location: Iowa

Dana Sconces and Auldbrass Chair at Auction

Post by Frankie-Oh »

Sotheby's is offering for sale two sconces from the Dana Thomas House. I don't recall noticing any missing scones on my tours of the house. Does anyone know where they came from?

Also up for auction is a chair from the Auldbrass Plantation and a Wasmuth Portfolio, if you have an extra $30,00 to $50,000 lying around.

Here's a link. http://catalogue.sothebys.com/auctions/ ... ction.html

The item numbers are 238, 239, and 245.
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

The provenance, "private collection," doesn't seem convincing. It's possible that extras were made for the house. But it's Don Hallmark who should evaluate and verify their bona fides.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

The copy says that the same sconce is (was ?) found at the Dana, Little (1903 ?), Heath, and Barton residences. There is also a photo showing one mounted horizontally at Taliesin. . .

Barton: http://www.buffalo.edu/news/hires/BartonHouse.jpg

SDR

[The Sotheby's page is cranky. Look for "view all" tab at top to return to page.]
Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4777
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

From what I have heard over the years, those sconces were designed by Walter Burley Griffin while working for Wright.
outside in
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: chicago

Post by outside in »

The sconces first appeared in the Emory House in Elmhurst in 1902 by Griffin. These two could come from a variety of sources.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

This is pretty clearly a cast piece, so once the pattern had been made it would be an economical use of that labor to deploy it for as many copies as
might be needed -- by more than one architect ? If Wright accepted the design work of G M Niedecken in his work, I suppose it would make sense
for him to utilize work by others within his own studio -- M Mahony being the first and most obvious example. . .

SDR
Last edited by SDR on Tue Dec 01, 2009 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

This photo was published with other Taliesin views by Yukio Futagawa in 1975. Someone who reads Japanese might tell us what the caption says --
there is no other indication of the location of the shot. Note that the end(s) of the lantern have been capped, presumably to control the nature of light emission. . .

Were the Emory house lanterns mounted vertically or horizontally ?


Image
outside in
Posts: 1338
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: chicago

Post by outside in »

This is the only time I've seen the lamp mounted horizontally - at the Emery House, Dana and others I believe it was mounted vertically so that the light would be directed up and down with the open ends.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Right. Note that the "standard" cast base is perfectly related to the little boxed-beam that has been contrived to mount it. . .appearing at first glance
to have been there as part of the architecture all along. The additional piece of molding behind perhaps conceals the necessary wiring as well as uniting
this mounting visually to the existing structure. . .

[My sense of Taliesin is that it was the place where Wright felt most comfortable creating and enhancing a virtually Medieval/timeless
(European and Asian) architectural environment. Parts of the compound -- the upper motor courts, for instance -- remind me of movie sets intended to
evoke Old Europe in movies from the 'twenties and 'thirties. As has been stated, Wright had only recently returned from Italy when he began building
this little universe. . .]

SDR
Healeyjet
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:20 pm

Post by Healeyjet »

SDR, I don't speak Japanese but I am a member of a Japanese Garden forum. I asked the question and one of the members from Japan had the following response.

Hi
Read as " sho mei ki gu. "Shomei" means light and kigu means device.


I was hoping it meant something exotic but it looks like it means light fixture.
Ward
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Thanks, Ward, I appreciate it. I was hoping that we might learn where in the residence that photo was taken. . .

I haven't yet found other images of this fixture besides the one linked above of the Barton interior. Anyone else ? Dana ?



As for the plywood chair said to be from Auldbrass, that's the model also seen at Pope and Sondern, and perhaps elsewhere. Then there's this
strange variant with arms, at Brandes. . .



Image
Pat Mahoney
Moderator
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 5:29 pm

Taliesin Sconces

Post by Pat Mahoney »

The sconces of this type at Taliesin were installed after Wright's death at the time the Heath house was being sold. The sconces and many art glass panels were removed after the current owner had signed the purchase contract which made no provision for them to be removed. The archives have acknowledged that the terms of their acquisition was less than perfect.
Post Reply