Herberger House 1955

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Herberger House 1955

Post by Tom »

Gheeze George Jetson
Has always seemed odd to me that all of Wright's domes have no oculus.

https://library.artstor.org/#/asset/286 ... 1105681955
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Herberger House 1955

Post by SDR »

A la the Pantheon, you mean ? The domed skylight of the Guggenheim might be called an oculus . . .? The skylights of the Larkin building, Unity Temple and his own Oak Park studio are his answer to overhead natural light---but those aren't domed structures.

There's a cupola atop the dome of building next door to the Call tower rendering (see Call model thread). That's as near as Wright came to including such a feature on a drawing.

Wright was into pure form---square, circle, cube, sphere, etc. He didn't interrupt a plane unnecessarily, nor introduce an historicist element without re-imagining it. There is something elemental about a hole in a dome, but it speaks as much to letting smoke escape as to admitting light---historically. Wright seems to have preferred that modern upstart, the chimney . . .

S
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Re: Herberger House 1955

Post by Tom »

Yes, exactly like the Pantheon.
It strikes me as perfectly elemental.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Herberger House 1955

Post by SDR »

Yes, I guess so. Yet different architectural artists will see the same things differently. Look at the fantasies of E-L Boullée:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Étienne-L ... oullee.jpg

We might imagine this to be in Wright's wheelhouse---yet he could as easily have shown a lack of interest or even contempt for it. I'm sure there are better or more interesting examples . . .

S
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Herberger House 1955

Post by Roderick Grant »

The Pantheon oculus serves a purpose: it gathers rainwater for a cistern and also evacuates excess hot air. Even though the patters of the dome interior are not circular, a circular oculus seems eminently appropriate. Whoever designed the Pantheon was equal to FLW; it is by far the greatest design of ancient Rome ... and of the Italian renaissance.
Post Reply