What is WrightChat's opinion on FLW AirBnBs?

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply

What do you think of FLW homes that have been converted to short-term vacation rentals?

Very pro
1
13%
Pro
5
63%
No opinion
2
25%
Against
0
No votes
Very against
0
No votes
Other (explain in comments)
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 8

n8b
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2020 7:37 pm

What is WrightChat's opinion on FLW AirBnBs?

Post by n8b »

:?: Curious, what is WrightChat's opinion on Frank Lloyd Wright homes that have been converted to short-term vacation rentals? See 10 Frank Lloyd Wright–Designed Houses You Can Stay In (Architectural Digest, 2018).

From my side, I imagine it might depend on who exactly is owning and operating the property? If it's a short-term rental conglomerate that's just buying the homes to make a profit, perhaps I'm not so pro. But if it's a passionate owner who wants to share the home with other architecture fans while also raising money for conservation, I'm pretty pro. But, in any event, the homes are being conserved and preserved into the future, which I think is a win for everyone.

What do you think?
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: What is WrightChat's opinion on FLW AirBnBs?

Post by SDR »

If the net outcome in either case is a restored and maintained residence capable of supporting its original intended use---the shelter and the pleasure of its occupants---then I see little difference in the means other than an ideology independent of the motivation. I see nothing wrong with ownership that seeks to profit from its investment. Covenants and easements aside, it is mainly the good will of those involved that must be depended upon for the healthy survival of these architectural treasures ?

S
MOman2
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 7:32 am

Re: What is WrightChat's opinion on FLW AirBnBs?

Post by MOman2 »

more Prairie homes please!!
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: What is WrightChat's opinion on FLW AirBnBs?

Post by SDR »

We need to remind ourselves of the unique and vital role that the Conservancy plays in the realization of the goal to preserve, maintain, and ensure the survival of the works of Frank Lloyd Wright. How many of the currently available Wright stay-overs benefitted from the services the Conservancy provides ?

S
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Re: What is WrightChat's opinion on FLW AirBnBs?

Post by Tom »

Voting is closed?

... never mind, somehow - I don't know how - I managed to vote.
Post Reply