Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:

Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

New on www.wrightinracine.com
"I may have stumbled on one of the only aspects of Frank Lloyd Wright's work that has not been mulled over (and over and over) when I was editing pictures I had taken in October during the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy Conference in Chicago. Taking pictures in the lobby of The Rookery Building on LaSalle Street was a bit like the proverbial "shooting fish in a barrel." You couldn't miss. I started digging in my files to see what other photos I had that show how Wright moved people up and down in his buildings…"

Mark Hertzberg
Mark Hertzberg
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by SDR »

Thanks for that, Mark. Among your photographs are several showing the stairways at the Hardy house, with their unusual zig-zag (or stair-step ?) baseboards. Other photos on recent additions to your blog show the same detail at three other Prairie-period residential stairs. To those I could add the Gridley and Robie houses---and I'm sure there are others.

A later example of a Wright stair with no diagonal lines is this one: https://www.flickr.com/photos/army_arch/331253595

Regular readers will recall my observation of Mr Wright's apparent aversion to the installation of handrails to his stairs (your blog shows a few, in fact, at Johnson Wax, at Wingspread and at the Greek Orthodox Church, most of them spiral flights). I do not find handrails in Studio and Taliesin drawings, and none at all among the many drawings of stairs at Fallingwater.

Did he dislike diagonal lines in elevation ? If so, would that inhibition extend to the typical handling of the baseboard that often accompanies a flight of stairs---a diagonal run of board and trim following the pitch of the steps. Would that explain the repetition of this handsome if amusing zig-zag trim---as well as the unique exterior stair at the western terrace at Bear Run ?

S
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

Thank you for the reminder about Fallingwater...I have added my photos to the blog piece. I regrettably don't know enough to answer your questions.
Mark Hertzberg
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by Roderick Grant »

FLW's aversion to stair rails or any oblique lines dates back to the beginning of his career. The first run of the stairs at Charnley is between two solid walls, no rail. The second run behind a full height of spindles with the steps contained in boxes. It's a stretch, but it could be argued that Charnley presaged Fallingwater in that detail.
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

Charnley...another one I had forgotten...I've added photos. Thanks, Roderick.
Mark Hertzberg
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by Roderick Grant »

That is a fabulous work of art. Proof that I was correct all along about Wright's authorship of Charnley. Sullivan would never have done such a piece of work.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by SDR »

At least we have another "data point" in the ongoing quest to prove Wright's substantial authorship of Charnley---for those still in doubt. Gracias.

S
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

I don't mean to claim to definitively state he is the author. I was going with a general feeling that he may have done at least the interior. I do not claim to be an expert on this. Outside In can tell us more.
Mark Hertzberg
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Upstairs Downstairs with Wright

Post by SDR »

Oh, sorry--I wasn't thinking of anyone in particular in my comment. I get the feeling that the arc of opinion on the matter is bending toward justice for Wright, as the principal or sole designer of Charnley; hold-outs seem thin on the ground these days. I am not one of those, myself. Maybe we could take a poll . . .

S
Post Reply