Berger

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Berger

Post by Tom »

https://www.realtor.com/realestateandho ... 2057049138

First time to notice the disjunction in the roof fascia over the entry.
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Re: Berger

Post by Tom »

... I think the Berger's built this in stages with the "pod" being completed first and the wing coming after.
This, I guess, has something to do with why that fascia is not continuous.
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Berger

Post by Roderick Grant »

Tom, you're correct. Berger was built by Mr. in stages over a period of years. There is a '50s Life Magazine article about it.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Berger

Post by SDR »

I assume that you mean this intersection:

Image

No drawing is found which details this juncture; you are correct that this is where the second phase of construction would have joined the first. (I am not sure that the construction of the bedroom wing didn't take place before the "pod" was complete.)

But it appears that Wright or his drafters left the builder little choice, as he brings a wider flat-roof fascia to abut the narrower one of the hipped roof of the initial construction. An elevation drawing (below) essentially fudges this meeting, resolving nothing. Aaron Green, who assisted Bob Berger when details like this cropped up, seems to have made the best of the situation. Note that the edges of the two roofs align in plan; Aaron wisely (inevitably) steps the carport roof back enough so that the wider fascia can die into the roof it abuts.


Image

Image

S
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Re: Berger

Post by Tom »

Yep - that's it.
One could hardly ask for a better shot of it.
... looks like the fascia fasteners are counter-sunk and plugged - impressive.
The wood appears to be in great shape. The finish does not float on the surface but seems to dissolve in the wood.
Do you have an idea of the date of that shot?
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Berger

Post by SDR »

I took it in February, 2019. The finish appears to be multiple coats of clear polyurethane or other varnish, with a fairly glossy surface. Photographs can be deceiving as to textures; multiple shots, with the right lighting, can reveal what's there.

Not sure when the wood was refinished. I have a piece of the mahogany bung (plug) that I found in the gravel beneath this fascia.

S
Matt2
Posts: 387
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:07 pm

Re: Berger

Post by Matt2 »

Is the reason for the wider fascia to stiffen the flat roof?
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Re: Berger

Post by Tom »

SDR - are you saying that my impressions of the wood finish is not entirely accurate - that there is more of a surface presence (build-up) of the finish than what appears from your shot?
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Berger

Post by SDR »

The roof, by the nature of its construction and finishes, is thicker than 6"

Yes, the surface is definitely a film, and its rich color is a product in part of a glossy clear coat.

S
Post Reply