DailyWright 7.13.22

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

DailyWright 7.13.22

Post by SDR »

Image
Photo © Dave Anderson

Once in a while at DailyWright we get something other than a photograph of a building---but always something the Andersons found at a building site.

This is a bit of a mystery: images seemingly drawn from a published version of the Wasmuth Portfolio (I have the Dover version of 1983) and displayed against a background of---the sky ?

Are these two pieces of paper stuck to a window that somehow avoids a view of any landscape or buildings ? A skylight, maybe ?

Another mystery is the source of the drawings. These are definitely the birds-eye view and second floor plan, complete with German titling, that appear at the top of Wasmuth Plate XXVIII---but the drawing here has a bit of lettering (illegible in the photo) at the right end of the view drawing, which lettering does not appear on the drawing reproduced in Dover (see below). And, the surprisingly messy texture added to the roof of the view drawing as seen in Wasmuth is not present on the yellow drawings here. So, something added and something taken away, comparing one with the other.

Image

The mystery is either solved or compounded when we find the drawing as part of the Francis Little set at Artstor: https://library.artstor.org/#/asset/296 ... 7724035304

What is the name Tafel doing on this drawing ? Where and when was this version of the drawing (with a much better roof texture applied throughout, most likely the true original state of the illustration) published ? And why would the Dover version contain an inferior roof texture ?

Image

S
Randolph C. Henning
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 9:04 am
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: DailyWright 7.13.22

Post by Randolph C. Henning »

Tafel in German is loosely translated as Plate (Plate XXVIII in this case). Unfortunately the Wasmuth plates published by Dover is a cheap reproduction. The Wasmuth portfolio has been reproduced and reduced into book form at least 6 times and none really do it justice (although I find the 1998 Rizzoli reproduction the best in terms of print quality). There are nuances in many original plates that are difficult to reproduce (line weight, washes for ground and/ sky, ink color, etc.). Plus the paper varies from plate to plate (something some never realize looking only at the book reproductions). One really needs to view the original plates to get a sense of their overall beauty and intricate details.
Post Reply