Part Usonian, Part Japanese - I like it

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Part Usonian, Part Japanese - I like it

Post by SDR »

Remarkable. Possibly more millwork per square foot than any comparable residential structure ? The site-assembled laminated trusses from sheet material(s) are notable. Less obvious at first take is the spiral circulation that takes the occupant clockwise from the entry, through the master suite and ending at the elevated sanctum---all of it open to the "overhead."

Let's hope this one gets built !

S
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Re: Part Usonian, Part Japanese - I like it

Post by DavidC »

Ken Dahlin is very talented and creative. He's done some beautiful work.


David
Tim
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 4:52 pm

Re: Part Usonian, Part Japanese - I like it

Post by Tim »

SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Part Usonian, Part Japanese - I like it

Post by SDR »

Having heard Ken Dahlin's definition of "organic architecture," I find it as convincing and useful as any other I've heard. He points to a repetition of form and detail, at all scales from the large to the small, bringing a sense of unity to the whole and a "resonance" that the observer apprehends as beautiful. He specifically mentions another use of the term, the familiar one which references natural materials or a sympathy with site, and appears to set it aside it in favor of the definition given here.

He defines the house presented as one providing a sense of shelter with its single over-arching roof with deep eaves, and cites the plywood trusses with their cutouts evoking tree branches. That suggests to me that he is not against the use of natural elements as ingredients in the composing of architectural form.

S
Post Reply