Wright Tourism is Back: Bits of Burnham

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Mark Hertzberg
Posts: 992
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 7:51 am
Contact:
Contact Mark Hertzberg

Wright Tourism is Back: Bits of Burnham

Post by Mark Hertzberg »

Wright Tourism is Back: Bits of Burnham

My latest blog entry on www.wrightinracine.com

Mark Hertzberg
Mark Hertzberg
Top
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Wright Tourism is Back: Bits of Burnham

Post by SDR »

Thanks, Mark ! Treasures both physical and photographic . . .

S
Top
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Wright Tourism is Back: Bits of Burnham

Post by Roderick Grant »

The duplexes are very fine designs, but their disposition as FLW intended, that included a broad, landscaped space between the structures, would have been much better. The are crammed into too narrow lots.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Click Here for General Discussion Posts”