Article: Architecture’s rekindled love affair with brick

[DavidC]

Architecture’s rekindled love affair with brick


David

[SDR]

On a scale of 0 to 5, I give this story a 2 on the Wright Chat Wrelevance Wright-O-Meter â„¢

[DavidC]

On a scale of 0 to 5, I give this story a 2 on the Wright Chat Wrelevance Wright-O-Meter â„¢

Here's the deal, Stephen. If you are going to chronically 'rate' my efforts on here - you will instantly be putting an end to those efforts.


David

[egads]

Here's the deal David, you need to curate just a little.

[DavidC]

Here's the deal, egads. If you believe the things I post are anything ranging from an annoyance to a detriment to the Forum I would suggest one or more of the following:

- first: and foremost, try doing the task yourself.
- second: complain loudly on here - and then even louder to the powers that be at the Conservancy.
- third: suggest that I run each post past you and/or Stephen for clearance.
- fourth: ignore each-and-every one of my posts.
- fifth: take up knitting.


David

[SDR]

David seems to enjoy posting whatever he finds that has the word "Wright" in it. Sometimes these items belong in "Sure, we can call . . .", other times they are uniquely relevant to what we discuss here -- items I'm sure most of us would have missed, in the vast media universe out there.

On the whole, it's a service, and one that no one else seems to have cared to provide. I suggest we leave him to it, and enjoy the benefits that accrue.

Thank you, David. I enjoyed my little jest; I'm sorry that you found it offensive, and I apologize.

SDR

[Roderick Grant]

We need more 'Davids,' not fewer.

[peterm]

Yes.

[DavidC]

Thank you for the apology, Stephen. It is most certainly accepted and appreciated.

And, thank you both Roderick and Peter.


David