Article: 3 Foursquare house currently for sale

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
DavidC
Posts: 10531
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Article: 3 Foursquare house currently for sale

Post by DavidC »

SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Well . . . it isn't a political discussion, anyway . . .

:D
DRN
Posts: 4462
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

I still believe there is a book in the story of Wright's Fireproof House for $5K and its progeny by Wright and those in his orbit...at the very least a good chapter in a wider scoped book about American Foursquares. Wright stripping the core cube of a builder house of its appendages and gingerbread creating something new, then the pattern books and precut house industry "softening" Wright's cube for the masses. I wonder if this "dialogue" may have led Wright to his ASBH effort.
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Yes. We do not, however, want to suggest that Wright was the inventor of the type ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Foursquare

It might be said that the American Foursquare both preceded and postdated Wright's innovations, and would likely have marched forward through the decades whether he had been born, or not. What architect, looking for a design that would deliver the most bang for the buck, would have ignored this most economical enclosure of space ?

Wright brought to the type the same improvements he was exploring in other and more innovative forms. The Fireproof House, viewed objectively, marked the addition of an attention-grabbing feature to an already progressive plan.

SDR
DRN
Posts: 4462
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

This is a good overview of the type as well:
www.oldhouseonline.com/.amp/articles/am ... foursquare

It would be interesting to see an earliest Foursquare, however impossible that may be. I suppose the earliest publication in a plan book would mark the type coming into its own. I have a Dover print of a compilation of house plans from the RWShoppell plan service dating from 1890 to 1900. There are a few plans that come close, but invariably they have a bay, bow, or cupola that muddies the thing. There are also tantalizing cottage designs that outwardly remind one of Bruce Price or an early Wright.

This is an online archive of period architectural catalogs:
https://archive.org/details/buildingtec ... agelibrary
Among them are some early plan books...I'll look through them and see what I can find.
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

And:

http://www.oldhouseweb.com/architecture ... 1930.shtml

Nice Craftsman foursquare here http://www.antiquehomestyle.com/styles/foursquare.htm

Some fancier foursquares https://www.homestratosphere.com/americ ... uare-home/

I don't necessarily agree that a porch is an inescapable part of the recipe -- but they do occur as a common addendum to almost any home, so a porch could be expected to be included, or added, as with many other types ?

I'm still trying to get at what makes the American stick-framed house a unique artifact. Don't they have lumber in other countries ? James Marston Fitch writes that the American wood-framed house historically made use of our unique abundance of timber. I'll have to take his word for it. I find it hard to believe that no one, anywhere, had build a roughly cube-shaped domicile of wood or brick until the phenomenon we're looking at here, occurred.

SDR
DRN
Posts: 4462
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

I'm wondering if the American distinction is rooted in milled light wood balloon or platform framing, particularly on an industrial scale. Most other countries use of wood in house construction historically focuses on timber framing, use of unmilled lumber (logs, branches, thatch), or masonry.
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

That makes sense to me. If we're talking about "who did it first" as opposed to "who's doing it today," I imagine that's right. Leave it to American ingenuity (as opposed to, what, German ingenuity or English ingenuity or Scandinavian ingenuity ?) to have leapt on the idea and turned it into an industry.

As to Wright's version of the foursquare: did he ever use that term himself ? Can we, considering his inventiveness and his ego, give him credit for taking on a house design of those proportions without once thinking that he was redoing a convention, rather than inventing a new type all his own ?

SDR
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Looking again at all the material posted so far -- and more -- it now appears foolish to claim that the porch is an optional accessory to the type . . .


Wright, of course, invents his own accoutrements:


Image FLW, 1907

Image



A porch, and other addenda, weren't long in coming, of course:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_ ... E_View.jpg

SDR
DRN
Posts: 4462
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

My first link above credits Old House Journal publisher Clem Labine as the first to call these houses Foursquares in a 1982 article. I first heard the term in a design studio in 1987.
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Aha. I'm surprised it's that late. Cool. Perhaps the term existed previously in some other context ?

I have images of two Wright Heritage Henredon case pieces with the word foursquare attached to them, presumably from the manufacturer ? "Foursquare" sounds like Wright, doesn't it . . .

Checking Thomas Hanks, I find the term spelled Four Square, and applied to the most orthogonal of the H H groups (Hanks, p 192):


Image
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Image

Image
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Looking through the offerings on the archive.org page Dan linked, I find a 1919 catalog, "Aladdin Homes, Sovereign System 1919 by Canadian Aladdin Co. Limited" and these back-to-back foursquare offerings:


Image

The copy is interesting: ". . . full two-storey, four-square space efficiency . . ."

A new form of Palladian window is conceived ?



Image

" . . . cottage roof . . ."


SDR
DRN
Posts: 4462
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

Moving this topic forward from the Great Outage. Keywords: foursquare, fireproof, 5000
A recent post brought up the subject of Prairie elements showing up on American Foursquares and them in turn being tied to Wright.

A link to a foursquare whose designer seemed aware of Wright's Hunt and Stockman, and their progeny...at least in its window placement:

http://www.antiquehomestyle.com/img/21ahb-11870.jpg

More plans here:
http://www.antiquehomestyle.com/styles/foursquare.htm

..and a familiar face:
http://www.antiquehomestyle.com/plans/l ... eproof.htm
SDR
Posts: 22365
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I love that Craftsman four-square. Both houses you show appear to have benefitted from their designers' exposure to Wright -- as have so many others ?

Perfect examples.

SDR
Post Reply