Dana-Thomas photos

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Dana-Thomas photos

Post by Roderick Grant »

I just got a note from Donald Hoffmann that the Dana-Thomas House has posted a new set of photos (12 exterior, 49 interior) by Doug Carr, a friend of his who lives in Springfield. Very handsome. The house looks great.

In 1990, John Geiger and I visited the house. I explained to Don Hallmark how two free-standing storage closets in the Main Bedroom above the Living Room should be arranged in the space to divide the sleeping area from the sitting area. Hallmark strongly disagreed, and they are still in the wrong place, but otherwise it's fine.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

It's remarkably easy to publish links like this one:

http://www.dana-thomas.org

What wonderful interiors; what great photos. There's much more to the house that I was aware of. Furnishing are grand. The tall fireplace settles with angled sides are a complete surprise, as are the pair of low beds flanking another fireplace. Another remarkable creature is a vertical metal table lamp. And the sumac murals . . .

SDR
Last edited by SDR on Sat Apr 15, 2017 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

I don't doubt that, SDR, but I am totally analog, and struggling to enter the 20th century.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

[I see now how one might lose one's composition on the message-posting page; if one is not logged in one cannot post, and in trying to do so one's work is lost, as Roderick has previously reported. Most annoying. A solution is to copy one's work, holding it in computer memory while logging in, then pasting it to the now-blank posting page and proceeding. I'm sure this glitch -- the requirement constantly to re-log in -- will be gone when the site is finally fully updated.]


The colors and textures of the restored Dana house interiors are glorious as well. This was truly an early opportunity for the architect to demonstrate his ability as a designer of interiors -- a "decorator" in the best sense of the word ?

SDR
jmcnally
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:23 am

Post by jmcnally »

So golden.

After we toured Robie a couple weeks ago, my daughter said that Dana-Thomas is still her favorite. It clearly left a great impression on her.
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Post by Tom »

Wow.
Next trip is to Springfield.
Had no idea really
pharding
Posts: 2254
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois
Contact:

Post by pharding »

That painted concrete trim is underwhelming in terms of fidelity to the original design.
Paul Harding FAIA Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, 1941 Lloyd Lewis House, 1952 Glore House | www.harding.com | LinkedIn
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

I agree, Paul. When I saw Dana 27 years ago, the trim was glaring. I expected it to mellow with time, but apparently it hasn't. Home owners who bemoan the rapid fading of their red terraces should find out what Dana used for the trim.
DRN
Posts: 4457
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

Why would it have been painted? Had railroad soot dinged it beyond cleaning? Had it spalled and mismatched patches were masked by painting?

I would have concerns on the most exposed elements (particularly horizontal surfaces) that painting may lock-in moisture that finds its way in, leading to more spalling.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I assume the water table is stucco or concrete. But is all the other trim concrete ? Caps and copings at Robie are stone, aren't they ?

I suppose the deep hair-pin at the entry would be concrete . . .


Edgar Tafel's photo of the Winslow water table. I thought I had seen the narrow vertical corduroy emblematic of some worked stone. But this is a horizontal texture.

Image
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Wright Home and Studio:


Image

Cast ? Carved ?


Image
Tom
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Post by Tom »

I have a feeling one goes to the Dana house for the interiors.
... I wish they'd get rid of The David however.
That strikes me as really tacky.
Duncan
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:05 pm

Post by Duncan »

The Wasmuth shows the David in apparently the same location, although facing the other direction.
Duncan
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:05 pm

Post by Duncan »

The Wasmuth shows the David in apparently the same location, although facing the other direction.
Reidy
Posts: 1742
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Fremont CA

Post by Reidy »

Tacky sculpture mattered to people in Wright's day. Dana has a cherub as well as David. Wright had Nike of Samothrace in his own house, and Hollyhock has some kind of nymph. My grandparents had Venus de Milo.
Post Reply