Article: Darwin Martin House - Buffalo, NY

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Article: Darwin Martin House - Buffalo, NY

Post by DavidC »

jmcnally
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:23 am

Post by jmcnally »

the effort in Buffalo to bring architecture to life is truly admirable
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

True.

I wonder what's killing the tree in the first photo. That specimen can't be 110 years old, can it ?

SDR
DRN
Posts: 4457
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

A lot of oaks in the northeast, especially urban ones, are being affected:

https://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/fidl ... ecline.htm

Two oaks on our property are showing signs of patchy branch die off, but the trees remain alive so far. The church down the street lost almost half of its all'ee which consists of two or more types of oaks...some species of oak are more susceptible than others.
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

Don Hoffmann emailed me about how impressed he was as he flew into Minneapolis/St. Paul, because there were no pesky trees blocking views of the architecture. I told him the entire city was an elm forest until an immense die-off in the 70s due to Dutch elm disease, followed by a maple scourge that took a lot of the rest. Here in California, we are losing the conifers to a bug infestation from, I believe, China.

At least it's the forces of nature. In Brazil, they are bulldozing the Amazon.
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

Unbrook
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Martin House

Post by Unbrook »

In the article there was no discussion of the landscape restoration and the great semi circle of plantings off the Living/Dining /Library Room. Is there any information or updates out there?
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

The planting is an intrinsic part of the design, but what was originally planted was a fragment of what was planned by WBG. The massing of plants that were to create the semicircle were so densely packed that it would have been impossible to maintain the garden, according to a plan that the house possesses.

The Martin Papers included a sketch for a semicircular pond in that area between the planting and the house, wrapping around the porch. As an original element of the design, and an important one, I would support the construction of it, even though it wasn't built.
Unbrook
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Martin House

Post by Unbrook »

I understand the landscaping was an important part of the overall design. I thought I heard/read that the Martin House Restoration was going to tackle this next. Since the original plan wouldn't work, does any one know what is planned? Do you think Ellen Biddle Shipman had any involvement at the Martin House?
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

I doubt it. Shipman was a colleague of Charles A. Platt, of whose architecture FLW was not fond (the feeling was reciprocated). Moreover, Shipman was just getting a start by 1910, after Martin was done. I doubt FLW had anything to do with her working on Graycliff, either. If FLW or DDM had enlisted the talents of a specialist in landscaping, I would suppose they would have chosen Jens Jensen.

FLW did, however, move closer to Shipman's work after his sojourn in Italy, which had inspired her by way of Platt. Taliesin I was decidedly of Italian heritage - house and landscaping.
Unbrook
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Lakewood, Ohio

Ellen Shipman

Post by Unbrook »

I didn't think Mr. Wright would have suggested Ms. Shipman, but my thinking was that after the fact the Martins might have brought her in. I wonder where they found out about her when they consulted with her at Graycliff.

There is a restored Shipman garden at Stan Hywet in Akron, Ohio and my grandfather was a gardener at an estate in Connecticut for which I understand she designed a garden. thus my interest in her work.
DavidC
Posts: 10529
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

pmahoney
Moderator
Posts: 244
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:14 am

Shipman in Western New York

Post by pmahoney »

Shipman was probably encountered at another estate in Western New York by the Martins. In Derby, New York alone she was involved in many projects at summer estates.
Post Reply