Wright, Usonia & affordable architecture to the masses

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Deke
Posts: 692
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:18 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Deke »

How pre-fab where these homes? There are two kinds of pre-fab. The first is building the structure in sections, trucking to the site, and assembling it. The other method...one I find much more interesting...is the kit of parts concept in which standardized elements like supports and wall panels are used. Schindler did a lot of work on this latter concept. I only wish Wright had. Given his affection for module systems and Japanese tatami-mat grid systems, I'm amazed he never worked in this direction seriously.

Deke
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

There is a third Erdman, Mono 8, 382-3, never built. Its proportions and simplicity of design suggest that the price would have been much more modest than Ranch Erdman, which is quite a sizable house for the times when the average house was in the 13 to 1500 sf neighborhood. Mini Erdman is, however, not a very handsome house.

Deke, I agree, a system of parts would be better than trucked sections. The idea that was floated here on another thread about re-imagining the UA system would not only be easier and cheaper, but as controlled by simple geometry as it is, could easily adapt to computer design.
Post Reply