To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.
EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Heh. Should Wrightians be insulted by the invoking of the word Fallingwater in connection with this house -- or relieved that there is virtually no resemblance to the "original" ?
I'm not following you, SDR... Where is the Fallingwater reference?
Roderick, I agree that Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition is an odd choice to accompany this house, (though it is one of my favorites). A wee bit grandiose?
That's what is remarkable about Aaron Copeland; he can be so heroic, with the wide vista, but always grounded, much like Wright's architecture.