Wright Chat

 
FAQ FAQ Register Register
Search Search Profile Profile
Memberlist Memberlist Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
Usergroups Usergroups Log in Log in

>> Return to SaveWright Home Page

Lamberson House Restoration
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 38, 39, 40, 41  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 14297
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2014 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well -- you be the judge. The "side entrance" is available both inside and out. This plan,
and so many others, demonstrate Wright getting what he wanted, within an attractive
envelope (assuming some forgiveness in the nether quarters). A very clever planner !



Stockman plan W A Storrer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
outside in



Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 1058

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peter, the house looks perfect - I believe you are the model "curator" of your building - you're setting a fine example for others to follow. congratulations.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wrighter



Joined: 09 Sep 2005
Posts: 471
Location: St. Louis, MO

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, I'll add my voice to the chorus. Congrats Peter--you were the perfect steward for Lamberson--the building is lucky to have found you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peterm



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 5587
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks guys! There's still more to be done. (But maybe that's just the case with any house?...) Next spring the chimney and roof problems will be addressed.

And thanks, again, John, for helping out with the structural, foundation and flashing issues. We wouldn't have known how to get started...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 14297
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's a photo (# T 33) which shows the new terrace steps floating partially unsupported. Was concrete added beneath -- or are they structurally sound as is ?

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
peterm



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 5587
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

PostPosted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was a miscalculation made on the lowest step, resulting in the slab being too narrow. A steel angle was attached to the slab which supports the brick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DavidC



Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 5815
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 7:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peter:

Thanks for allowing us to see the 'work-in-prgress'. You and all in involved are to be commended for taking the time and effort to do a true 'craftsman's-style job' on all of this. Congratulations - everthing truly looks fantastic!

And I really like the new 'half-wall' for the service entrance area. Perhaps next time you or someone who is there you could take a picture of that area from further away to help show it in overall 'Lamberson-context'?


David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 14297
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was hoping for this shot as well. Here are two views, in different lighting, of the house in its new form . . .








The new wall is parallel in space to the left-hand portion of the central masonry mass. It's a great addition to the composition, don't you think ?

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
peterm



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 5587
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Next time I'm there, I'll take a midrange photo.

It's a subtle change from what was built, but does eliminate the double entrance dilema:




Thanks for posting, SDR.


Last edited by peterm on Thu Oct 16, 2014 12:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3164
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with SDR...
Subtle as the new carport wall is, I think it lends an important layer to the composition that unifies it. The "before" appearance of the composition seems divided at the carport due to the receding utility core wall and deep shadow. The new wall adds a mediating layer that, at least to my eye, visually knits the wings of the house together when the house is viewed in bright sunlight/deep shadow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 14297
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And, its height mediates between the sill/terrace wall height, and that of the roof and the superstructure. The space above the new wall echoes the height of the nearest window sill . . . in the negative. Very satisfying.

Something really seems to be missing, now, in the earlier shots !

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3164
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was perusing the Taschen Vol.3 last evening and found the Lamberson house entry. The floor plan presented appears to be an iteration of the document that includes the recently built carport wall, but before the new terrace stair was added. I was more interested by what appear to be pencil markings at the fireplace...despite the use of reading glasses PLUS a magnifying glass, I couldn't quite make out the notes before pixilation set in.
Peter: Do the plans in your files include additional notes, marks, or any suggested revisions at the fireplace? I am preparing to repair the fireplace chimney, damper, and hearth prior to the new roofing being installed next summer...better to have masons clambering on old shingles rather than new roofing....it would be good to know what may have been noted on a similarly tall fireplace, possibly after original construction began.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 14297
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lamberson


Sweeton

Sweeton
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3164
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another question....the rear wall of the firebox at Sweeton is not canted inward as shown on the drawings, rather the firebrick is plumb, presumably to avoid detailing a closure at the return end elevation. Does Lamberson have a plumb or canted rear wall in its firebox?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peterm



Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 5587
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Answering your most recent question first: the firebrick wall is plumb, not canted...

And to your previous question... What I can read from the drawing as shown in the Taschen volume is this: fireplace brick hood above... pier, corner, pier, brick hearth, see sheet 4 (illegible)

There are several other drawings (earlier and later) with different details shown.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 38, 39, 40, 41  Next
Page 39 of 41

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP