EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Peter's Snowflake is a work of Architecture in its own right, not to be compared with the work of Wright. Granted, there are precedents for some aspects of the building design in Wright's work: notably the strip of shops in Wright's "Paradise on Wheels" trailer park may have served as inspiration for the basic section and plan, but the site plan, building placement, the signature /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ shell type form of the 2x12 roof structure were all Peters, and in the opinion of this architect, really good.
Unfortunately, economics plays a large part in the built environment. The Snowflake was built to earn profit for the original owners, the Sarkisians. The change of travel/vacation patterns, change of surrounding land uses, increased preference and prevalence of national chain hotels, and costs of operation (central HVAC per building rather than individual units per room) all conspired to make the Snowflake not financially viable as a motel in its current market.
Over the years, I've tried to think of adaptive reuse schemes for the Snowflake: join rooms to make extended stay units or short term lease apartments, a banquet/conference facility, a day spa, a corporate or church retreat center, an arts/antiques mall, with sensitive additions..a church. All fell victim to my timidity, my lack of ability or for that matter, intestinal fortitude of coming up with the $1.6 million asking price. In addition, the costs of renovation and adaptation of the buildings to a new use in the depressed climate of that corridor make most of the wild ideas seem even wilder.
The Snowflake will be missed..at least by me.
I really feel for the young of today who will grow up thinking that the United States was always littered with the same dull chains, crappy junk food barns, look-a-like hotels and cheapo, cheapo architecture where styrofoam crown molding is glued in place. I can't imagine anyone in the future ever feeling nostalgic for the corporate junk that is built today.
So maybe the Snowflake wasn't the best of architecture but at least it was CREATIVE - something absolutely lacking as you drive the look-a-alike strips that dominate the land today.