A Lautner Gem in Echo Park

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
DRN
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

A Lautner Gem in Echo Park

Post by DRN »

Not sure if we Chatted about this little Lautner in Echo Park or not, but I think we should...
https://www.latimes.com/business/real-e ... -echo-park

I love it.

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

We did look at it, briefly http://wrightchat.savewright.org/viewtopic.php?t=12447

but I agree that it deserves more discussion. My assertion is that Lautner's work again and again embodies, in each instance, a fresh formal and (usually)
structural Idea. If so, this one is clear: a row of novel frames, supporting a simple flat roof (would they be moment frames ?), seen in their naked and
robust simplicity.

What else ?

S

DRN
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

The continuous rhythm of the frame elements unchanged, whether inside or out, supporting that continuous blade of a roof is very pleasing to my eye. The closure partitions and glazing are simple screens as Wright called them, just lending some privacy to the very clear and elemental shelter made up of the frames and roof blade. A datum is set up with the continuity of the frames and roof through the house that both organizes the spaces and instills a sense of orientation within the house as it relates to the exterior.

It pleasurably struck a nerve.

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Yes---it's not just the frames, is it---that marvelous roof, presumably concealing inverted trusses which inform the section. The street elevation is the "sell," on this one.

I imagine a riff on the theme would be a bat-wing (boomerang) plan, or even a curve---hemicycle fans take note ? And of course the roof surface need not be flat, but could take anything up to a 1:3 pitch, say ?

Further development could involve a clerestory, whose profile would be an extension of the frame. Whoopie . . .!

S

DRN
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

Yes!
To make a pitched roof, the truss framed blade could even be rotated in section such that one of the bottom facets was horizontal. This might set up a prospect and respite, or static and dynamic situation under a single element.

DRN
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

Some images of Lautner’s study model and drawings of the house:
http://architectoid.blogspot.com/2014/0 ... o.html?m=1

and some recent exterior pics:
http://lukegibsonphotography.com/blog/o ... kin-house/

interiors:
https://bestorarchitecture.com/the-salkin-house/

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I'm not quite digging the rear elevation; the relationship of roof to wall is a bit awkward ? But if that's the worst that can be said of this design, I'll live with it.

Too bad he didn't find occasion to work again with this type. The trio of designs that use a three-legged steel spider frame---Carling, Polin, Jacobsen---seem to be the only such re-use of a form and structure in the Lautner catalog . . .

S

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I don't recall seeing a Lautner model before. Did he do them often ?

S

Tom
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Post by Tom »

Looks like the new owners took out the fireplace in the living room.
But I don't see that fireplace in the original Lautner plan.

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I see the fireplace in Lautner's plan---at the top of the sheet. It's an L shape. What's odd is that the photo showing the fireplace, near the bottom of the page, seems to require
more room where the photographer stood---implying an expansion into the carport. Yet the boarded volume in the exterior photo is on the wrong side of the carport, for that to work.

In any event, the restored street elevation is most convincing. The fireplace is present in the last photo on this page:


http://lukegibsonphotography.com/blog/o ... kin-house/

S

Tom
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Post by Tom »

Got it
So what's that thing in the "Before Livingroom" photograph of the first posted article?

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

The fireplace in these two "before" photos is identical---note the (mis)placement of fire screen panels. The difference in the apparent
angle of the verticals in one photo is due to a camera lens choice; note that the angles of the structural frames varies as well. Compare
second and third images . . .


Image

Image



That the fireplace doesn't appear in this "after" photo doesn't mean that it isn't there; it is simply out of sight to the left ?

Image

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Some of the glazing---and the pitch of the roofs---remind me of Ulrich Franzen's house, a continent away and nearly a decade on:

https://ofhouses.tumblr.com/post/178032 ... se-rye-new

S

Tom
Posts: 3209
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Post by Tom »

Yep - that solves it.

This house also resembles the house by Saitowitz on Stinson Beach
... at least the peel up roof part.

BTW: That's the best look at Franzens house I've ever seen. Seems like a really great house to me. Did not think that before.
That website is awesome. Wish the other houses in general were identified by their architects more clearly however.
One thing that strikes me while perusing through it is how the more overly expressive houses don't hold up over time.

You post some really good websites here bro.
Thanks
("bro" means "brother" it's what hip kids say these days)

SDR
Posts: 19639
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Dude---I'm hip. Keep 'em coming . . .

I just prowl the Images pages on Google; the most amazing things pop up, from time to time. So glad I survived to the digital age. Just fell into the
wireless world; my new iPhone 6 S+ isn't even "live" yet---the number-porting-from-landline conundrum is operating. Had this number for c. 40 yrs . . .

Since linking the phone to the Mac I'm getting rashes of Notification pop-ups (slide-ins)---this morning it's Black Friday sale previews. Like most of
these, they don't stay on the screen long enough to bother---or even to be read. What's the point ?

Oy.

S

Post Reply