Glenbrow/Gunning Tower Restoration

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Modmom1
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2017 1:09 pm

Glenbrow/Gunning Tower Restoration

Post by Modmom1 »

The Glenbrow Tower was designed by Ted van Fossen in 1964 for Robert and Mary Gunning for use as office space, work space and a guest suite with a roof terrace with a Murphy bed. The structure was connected to the carport which added 2 more bays at the time for a total of 4. The original lower level had a kiln and work table, the entry level was Mr Gunning's office, the third level was a bedroom/bathroom and the final was the roof terrace.

Ted van Fossen(TvF) had worked on the original main house in 1940 with Tony Smith and Larry Cuneo, left for Los Angeles and by 1956 had returned to Ohio where he partnered with Martha and Dick Wakefield on Rush Creek Village, a community in Worthington, OH of nearly 50 homes all inspired by Wright's Usonian principles. Although TvF had spent a year at The New Bauhaus (under the direction of Lazlo Moholy-Nagy, and he worked as a laborer alongside FLW apprentices Smith and Cuneo, he never had a formal architectural education.

Like the main house, the tower sat with little maintenance from 2006 to the time we purchased it in 2014. It was left open to the elements and suffered even worse damage than the 1940 main house. Although we sealed it up after a mold remediation, our initial focus was on the main house. Joe discovered several serious design flaws that lead to the poor condition. The drainage on both the roof over the stairwell and the roof terrace was done incorrectly, causing water to penetrate the corners and avoid the scuppers. The entire roofing structure was removed, correctly rebuilt with crickets and flashing and a new roof was installed. From there they worked on replacing compromised structure (most) and laid new subfloor. New operable Marvin windows were installed. Joe created a bris soleil on the ravine side to facilitate the installation of the window. A new egress window was added to the bedroom (3rd Level) and counter level windows were added similar to the main house to add light to a dark space. There were 2 entry level doors, placed back to back which made no sense. One was removed and new entry doors (lower, entry and roof levels were added, There was VERY LITTLE salvable material due to deterioration.

This is a work in progress and the goal is to finish up sealing the exterior before cold weather hits. Once the structure is approved, the trades will return to install all new plumbing, electrical and hvac systems.
Some photos to scroll through:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/184945691 ... 594815836/

DavidC
Posts: 7912
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

It's coming along great, Dori! Fantastic work by you, Joe and those you've hired to rescue the Tower. I remember when my wife and I toured it a few years before you had purchased it. It was in very tough shape then. It looked to be on the verge of being a demo.

Congratulations - and thanks - for saving it!


David

Post Reply