Walker update from this week's Carmel Pine Cone

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
CEP
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:56 pm

Walker update from this week's Carmel Pine Cone

Post by CEP »

Council OKs preservation contract, tax break for Frank Lloyd Wright house
By MARY SCHLEY
"CHUCK HENDERSON and his family, longtime owners
of the distinctive Frank Lloyd Wright-designed house built on
the rocks above the south end of Carmel Beach, will get a
tax break in exchange for their commitment to protect and
rehabilitate the house formally named Cabin on the Rocks
for at least the next decade, the city council decided Tuesday
evening.
Commissioned by Della Walker, Henderson’s great-grandmother, from the famous architect in 1948 and completed in
1952, the home is on the local, state and national historic registers, and in June, the city’s historic resources board voted
to recommend the city council approve Henderson’s proposal.
Over a 10-year period starting in 2020, Henderson said he
plans to replace the roof, living room upholstery and north
side windows, shore up the north side bluffs and repair the
stone steps to the beach, install a new boiler, and put in an
automatic gate to discourage the trespassers that have become
a problem, among other improvements.
All the work has to be done in conformance with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic
Properties, and according to his estimates, the maintenance
and repairs will cost $1,112,533. The contract has a minimum
term of 10 years, and one year is added to the term on each annual anniversary date to extend the agreement up to 20 years,
unless Henderson or the council terminates it."

SDR
Posts: 19638
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Good news ! ... Thanks, CEP

Two of our previous threads about the house:

http://wrightchat.savewright.org/viewtopic.php?t=10542

http://wrightchat.savewright.org/viewtopic.php?t=8879

SDR

DRN
Posts: 3984
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

This is great news.
On top of all of the work to maintain a historic house, let alone one bathed in salt spray, Chuck, as the family's representative for the house, has had to jump through many hoops and expend a lot of effort and treasure to obtain approvals from the California Coastal Commission to take steps to bolster the stone bluff and make repairs to the terrace masonry from the erosion caused by the surf. The CCC's dictate of non-intervention with respect to erosion of the coast was a possible death sentence for the house.

The local municipality's granting of a tax break will certainly help offset some of the costs needed to keep this local landmark high and mostly dry.

Matt2
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:07 pm

Post by Matt2 »

Wonder what the tax bill is? Why not protect the house longer than 10 years?

And if only they mandated a yearly open house for tours!

Reidy
Posts: 1597
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Fremont CA

Post by Reidy »

The house opens once a year for the Carmel Heritage house tour and occasionally for smaller fundraisers.

SDR
Posts: 19638
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

"The CCC's dictate of non-intervention with respect to erosion of the coast was a possible death sentence for the house." Nutty---but there you have it. I'm all for sensible regulation on behalf of Nature---but it's nonsense like this that gives all of bureaucracy a bad name ...?

Thanks for the facts, Dan and others.

S

Post Reply