Article: Price Tower may offer HUD affordable housing

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
DavidC
Posts: 7394
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Article: Price Tower may offer HUD affordable housing

Post by DavidC »


DRN
Posts: 3919
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

How many duplexes are in use by the Inn at Price Tower?
Will this plan remove the possibility of a recreation of Bruce Goff’s home and studio from photos?

Roderick Grant
Posts: 9875
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

Considering HUD's track record, this scheme does not look promising.

ZacharyMatthews
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:20 pm

Post by ZacharyMatthews »

DRN wrote:How many duplexes are in use by the Inn at Price Tower?
Will this plan remove the possibility of a recreation of Bruce Goff’s home and studio from photos?
Floors 9-10 were used by Bruce Goff as his work/live space until 1964 when he moved to Kansas City MO. They are currently unused as Inn property (Previously it was the fitness center-a few stationary bikes and yoga mats)) I feel if this plan was to move ahead the Goff suite would be the easiest for them to rehab for HUD, which may include major ADA alterations. I'd hope to see BG's space recreated instead and have had numerous meetings with past directors about the restoration but the numbers were always too high @ over $100K (a very high overshoot in my eyes)

Jeff Myers
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

I’d prefer to not see HUD in the tower. The tower could suffer damage, needs a 24 hour staff and security, ADA alterations that could impede on the historic structure.

This is my opinion and I’ve almost lived in a 2 different HUD apartment complexes, but after what I saw I ran.
Drugs, not enough staff to maintain the property, which leads to deterioration. It is best if the tower sought out an architecture team to restore the building after finding a donor.
Developing and rehabbing an old structure is no small project.
JAT
Jeff T

Roderick Grant
Posts: 9875
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

Would those tiny elevators pass ADA standards? If not, that would put the kibosh on the entire plan, which would be a good thing.

Jeff Myers
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

Those tiny elevators, custom designed by Wright and built by Otis, may not pass. They would have to restore the apartment elevator to service.

They can grandfather in certain things though.
I remember on a visit some people were taking drapery up to the 17th floor. They used Harold Price’s elevator, in plans it is labeled that, in order to get to the floor but they could barely fit this drape and just one person into the car.
Makes you wonder how they took all the wood, beds, and numerous other stuff up, likely by the stairs.
JAT
Jeff T

Roderick Grant
Posts: 9875
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

"They would have to restore the apartment elevator to service."

What do you mean by that, Jeff? There are only 4 tiny elevators, none of which has room to be expanded to handle a wheelchair without causing havoc to the design of the entire building.

I once took a ride up with the late, claustrophobic John Payne (Richardson House owner). I believe Roland Reisley was along, as well as at least one other person. Poor John, he was ready to leap out of his skin. I didn't enjoy the lift, either.

During construction, as photos in Story show, there was a structure alongside the building that included a lift, so getting things up and down would not have been a problem. Once built, for tenants, commercial or residential, to haul up their stuff would have been a problem without taking big things apart. But you cannot take a king-size mattress apart, so you might have to bend it to fit. But then what would you do with the box spring?

Jeff Myers
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

The apartment elevator is out of service as it houses modern lines for internet. I do recall the exterior scaffolding, I forgot it served as a lift.
JAT
Jeff T

DavidC
Posts: 7394
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »


SDR
Posts: 18806
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

"'We would use two of our three hotel [rooms] ... and then we would utilize one on [floor] seven. ... We’ve looked at
reallocating that space into handicapped space because the grant requires that one space be handicapped accessible,' Loyd said."

Is any elevator in the building large enough to accept a wheelchair ? Could any bath be made wheelchair-accessible ?

S

Roderick Grant
Posts: 9875
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

No and no. There is no way to accommodate any sort of "update" that would not violate the floor plan.
But the real argument against the entire idea is getting into bed with HUD, or any other government entity.

Jeff Myers
Posts: 1805
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Tulsa
Contact:

Post by Jeff Myers »

They do have a handicap room.

With this being on the register, the elevators, stairs, and ceilings are not exactly code. This is a detriment to this building but I doubt it will go through considering the fact it’s three apartments, there’s a museum, it’s historic and nothing is to code I can’t see it being hud housing.
Get a better developer, accept that it’s not to modern codes, but make it livable should work. I’ve run into apartment complexes, dating prior to ADA codes, that have had to either forgo the codes or have to do a lot in modifications. The cost can pile up by bringing a building up to codes.

I would actually love to see Goff’s suite returned as a rentable historic apartment.
JAT
Jeff T

DRN
Posts: 3919
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 10:02 am
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

Post by DRN »

Comments from Price Tower Executive Director Rick Loyd:
There are three hotel suites at Price Tower that were formerly apartments when the building was originally built, Loyd explained. Another area could also be transformed into an apartment to comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act � a necessary step to even be eligible for the HUD grant.
...If everything pointed to the grant being suitable for the Price Tower, three hotel suites would be converted to residential living space.
“We would use two of our three hotel [rooms] ... and then we would utilize one on [floor] seven. ... We’ve looked at reallocating that space into handicapped space because the grant requires that one space be handicapped accessible,� Loyd said.
Is the Inn at the Price Tower considering closing or removing two of its bi-level apartments from the offerings to overnight guests?

“My intent and our board’s intent is never to turn this property into low-income housing project,� Loyd said. “I think that term of ‘low-income residence’ has lot of negative connotations, and I get all that. When I view the discussions, initially, it was could our interns, could our Wright Chef, could that constitute somebody under that low income, and it could. So, that’s how I narrowly thought, or naively thought, of that. I don’t have hundreds of dealings with HUD. ... All those things being said, that’s how this came about.�
It is my understanding if government grant money or tax credits are accepted in exchange for providing low income housing, the building owner has no say in the choice of tenants. Eligible tenants from a wait list are assigned to a property based on their place on the list and the property's suitability to the tenant's needs. This is not to say this will yield bad tenants, but it is unlikely that the apartments could be used as on-site housing for current low income eligible staff of the Tower.

Craig
Posts: 560
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:25 am
Location: California

Post by Craig »

Seems like such an odd idea. Does this mean the hotel concept has failed? Is this the best that can be done with the building? Couldn't the units be rented simply as market rate apartments or does no one in the area care to live in the tower?

When I stayed there it was a cold, rainy weekend and it was not comfortable in our unit. The hotel provided portable space heaters in the attempt to warm up the room.

Those elevators are like vertical coffins. Just the thought of being stuck in one due to mechanical or power issues is enough to make one use the stairs. I can't imagine a typical HUD tenant dealing with them.
ch

Post Reply