| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DavidC
Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 7184
Location: Oak Ridge, TN
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SDR
Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18275
Location: San Francisco
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2019 1:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Seems to be an accurate account. The story of Ned, however, is entirely new to me...
The headline, of course, is merely bizarre.
S |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DRN
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3836
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The headline does two disservice’s: it casts Loren Pope as a hapless star struck person willing to be reckless with his finances; further, it portrays Wright as the careless artist who is without regard for his client’s means. Headlines like this just perpetuate overly simplistic or inaccurate stereotypes of Wright and his clients. It is a shame as the article itself is rather good.
The Ned story is news to me as well, but it does help explain Pope’s emotions upon leaving the house for the last time as its owner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roderick Grant
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 9597
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Loren Pope attended some of the early FLWBC events. He was an interesting gentleman. Hardly star struck. He was as perfect a client for FLW as ever there was. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Reidy
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 1541
Location: Fremont CA
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pope told an interesting story at the Buffalo conference in the mid 90s.
One of the big complaints about the first relocation of the house was that it changed the compass orientation, thus destroying Wright's calculated lighting effects over the course of the day or the year. I asked him if he hated this as much as some did. He replied that they never built it to Wright's orientation in the first place. The builders walked around the lot with the drawings and promptly announced that they couldn't do it. After considering various rotations they hit on one that was buildable and proceeded with the job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SDR
Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18275
Location: San Francisco
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That important anecdote in turn invites inspection of and reflection on the subsequent relocations...?
That is, to find one spot on the original site that actually suited Wright's choice of floor data now seems a miracle; to have found two further
sites that could accommodate the design properly seems next to impossible---without some modification of the terrain, in one or both cases.
S |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jay
Joined: 02 May 2016
Posts: 219
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Headlines like this just perpetuate overly simplistic or inaccurate stereotypes of Wright and his clients. It is a shame as the article itself is rather good. |
While the editors used to write most of the headlines, I wonder if there's not some sort of SEO-focused algorithm that generates them now? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roderick Grant
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 9597
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The orientation of FLW's work is belabored. Look at Jacobs I and Palmer. In both cases, the houses were flipped, one to accommodate a new lot, the other on the same lot. No alteration to the plans were made. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
