EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
It's classic Lautner, anyway: take a simple geometric idea, one that makes sense married to a particular structural scheme, and let it play, unmolested by extraneous second thoughts or other distractions.
Speaking of structure, isn't there something missing from that section drawing: what supports the 3" plank floor, between walls ?
And, I'm surprised to see a savvy builder specify lapped siding for a cylindrical wall. Boards will bend, but they aren't easily persuaded to take a compound or conical form...
These Saitowitz houses compare to this Lautner house
in a kind of simplcity of plan and resourcefulness of means.