Form Follow Materials?

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Matt2
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:07 pm

Form Follow Materials?

Post by Matt2 »

I am researching mid-century design in the Pacific NW and come to the conclusion that the local materials...namely wood...created a more Miesian design aesthetic. Like Mies, the wood buildings had regular bays with exposed post and beam structure.

Am I right in the observation that the Europeans who worked in concrete made more sculptural volumes, while those who worked in steel (or wood) made structures of flat planes in regular modules? Are these two recognized schools of modernism?

Wright was in neither camp. His modules were much smaller...3-4 feet or so.

Post Reply