The Open Office brought to us by FLW

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4290
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

The Open Office brought to us by FLW

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

Owner of the G. Curtis Yelland House (1910), by Wm. Drummond

SDR
Posts: 19048
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »


Roderick Grant
Posts: 9998
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

Bad grammar aside, this article is intellectually slipshod. I don't know the specifics of "Biophilia," but when I see the language bent to the breaking point to sell an idea, I become suspicious. I don't believe the tendency of people "to seek connections with nature and other forms of life" has anything to do with the efficiency of the workforce. The kookaburra is an element of nature, but I wouldn't want to listen to one while trying to balance the general ledger. Nature is an escape from the workaday world, which, by way of incessant repetition, becomes intolerable.

There is certainly an argument to be made that the open office has deficiencies, in spite of the overwhelming success of Johnson Wax, where people apply for jobs just for the opportunity to work in that wonderful space, and probably as well, Saarinen's office for John Deere. Noise is certainly part of the problem, but adding positive noise to the natural noise of the office isn't the solution; that merely compounds the problem.

It's largely moot, however, since so much of the work done in those open offices will be taken over by bots in the near future. It is, after all, only the drones who are subjected to open offices; the executives have always remained in their private corner offices with views and hidden bars. The Fascist pigs!

Post Reply