Wright Chat

 
FAQ FAQ Register Register
Search Search Profile Profile
Memberlist Memberlist Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
Usergroups Usergroups Log in Log in

>> Return to SaveWright Home Page

A North Manitou Mystery
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 8417

PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDR, the stone infill "imitating a foundation" may be a way to keep out skunks, which will seek refuge from weather wherever they can find it. In Minnesota, there is a way to get rid of skunks under the porch: Just toss in a freshly boiled batch of lutefisk. Of course, while it gets rid of the skunks, one must then find a way to get rid of the Norwegians.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
outside in



Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 1134

PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe Mrs. Blossom was the daughter of Boardman. It was my understanding that Boardman bought land on the island to create a large apple farm. The Blossoms were probably given free land on which to build.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sjnorris



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 2:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

*During the summer of 1893, Silas Boardman’s married daughter, Carrie Blossom, suggested that a resort community be developed on the island, and her father came up with the concept that led to what became known as Cottage Row, a string of ten summer homes along the low bluff facing the lake, just south of the Life Saving Station complex. The owners of these summer places were mainly couples who were friends of the Blossoms in Chicago, one being Mr. and Mrs. Howard W. Foote. Howard Foote engaged two skilled carpenters at Chicago to build their cottage on the island. According to an oral tradition, the Foote’s owned a music store in Chicago and had been exhibitors at the World’s Columbian Exposition in 1893, After the Fair closed, Foote supposedly salvaged materials as booths were dismantled, including fancy woodwork and stained glass windows, then shipped them to North Manitou for use in the construction of their cottage. One of the hired carpenters was Nicholas Feilen, who was born in Chicago, the son of Prussian immigrant carpenter Christave Feilen (or perhaps “Fealen”) and his wife Catharine. Nicholas’ work was apparently impressive enough that he was hired to build cottages and other structures by several others, which led to him calling upon his younger brother John, a skilled cabinet-maker, for assistance. Nicholas settled permanently on North Manitou, establishing a farmstead with a fine home next to the Bourniques at the island’s south end, supporting himself as a carpenter and farmer. He never married, and died on the Island in 1939 at the advanced age of 87.


* From http://www.manitouislandsarchives.org/index.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 15931
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More: a map which Stafford found online.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 15931
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stafford found this on the Library of Congress site. The image is not available, there, at a larger size.

https://www.loc.gov/resource/hhh.mi0325.sheet





While the Historic American Building Survey project provides us with a priceless resource, the drawings necessarily show only what was found on
the date when the measurements and photos were taken -- many years after the date of construction. In the case of this house, we know from a
photo displayed earlier that there was a time when the space below the porch floor perimeter was not blocked with stones, there was no parapet
panel to the porch, and there were no skinny verticals present above the porch railing.

However, the drawing does show something that could only have been present after the skinny verticals were in place: insect screening attached
to those verticals.

Anything else of note ?

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 8417

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

'Monte Carlo' cottage? George and Carrie Blossom cottage? What's what?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3513
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the article:
Quote:
She said there is a lot of reason to believe it is a Wright.

“This is work that was done way before he started doing Prairie style, but it still has some of those elements, I mean the long grooves and the hearth in the center of the house,” she said. “The doors are, like, four feet wide. When you think about 1894, that’s kind of unusual.”

The doors and the open, airy spaces are features not found on typical cottages of that era. The b(m?)olding also has a silhouette that is strikingly similar to Wright’s Winslow House, a home in River Forest, Illinois, that he designed that same year.


Would wide doors, open spaces, and moldings similar to Winslow be definitive clues? Were Winslow moldings unique? In any case, it would be interesting to see comparison pictures of the cited details.

I'm not convinced at this point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 15931
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right. Even were there to be moldings at the cottage and at the Winslow house that appeared similar, this would be no miracle, as Wright was still using conventional
molding profiles at this early stage of his career -- as he not ?

I am not able to find a source for the moniker "Monte Carlo" as applied to the Blossom cottage. Another citation (in parentheses) is found half-way down this page:

https://www.nps.gov/slbe/planyourvisit/nmivillage.htm

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 15931
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And these are pages from a pamphlet published by the Friends of Sleeping Bear Dunes, with slightly different text from that in the previous entry (above).

There is still no hint of where "Monte Carlo" came from; perhaps it was the Blossoms's version of "Dun Roamin'" or "Casa Fiasco" . . .






Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mark Hertzberg



Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 776

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Storrer seems to be his usual peevish self, displeased in this case that somebody else might have discovered a new building. Does he have drawings for any of his alleged discoveries, such as that Dutch colonial in Racine?[/b]"

Since delving into Mitchell I have believed there are two arguments against FLW as the primary architect (I accept that he may have helped Corwin). 1) The Inland listing which has Wright / Bagley House below. Wright had left Adler & Sullivan and had no reason to hide his work behind Corwin's name anymore. 2) Wright's first commission in Racine was the Mile House remodeling project (1901) which I documented in 2003 with Brian A. Spencer's help. The job first went to Corwin who in 1899 submitted a drawing to the client of a miniature Mitchell grafted on to the existing house. Would he have done this if he had not designed Mitchell? I would think not. I have this in my "Wright in Racine" book and have raised it with Bill Storrer.
_________________
Mark Hertzberg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3513
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The pamphlet describes the cottage as a "dog-trot" house. Is it still a dog-trot with its breezeway enclosed? Per the old photo, it would seem the breezeway was enclosed very early in the cottage's history, if indeed it was ever open at all. We need to see a full floor plan, not just a plan of the porch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogtrot_house

Though Wright would have familiarity with southern US and Gulf Coast house types via the Sullivan/Charnley opuses at Adler & Sullivan, he was certainly not the only person in the Great Lakes region to know of dog-trot houses. I don't believe that is worth hanging a hat on...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 8417

PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 12:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I vote a resounding NO on both Mitchell and Manitou.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP