Wright Chat

 
FAQ FAQ Register Register
Search Search Profile Profile
Memberlist Memberlist Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
Usergroups Usergroups Log in Log in

>> Return to SaveWright Home Page

Article: FLW Trust buys neighboring property - Oak Park, IL
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DavidC



Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 6130
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:54 pm    Post subject: Article: FLW Trust buys neighboring property - Oak Park, IL Reply with quote

Frank Lloyd Wright Trust expands its footprint with new house


David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reidy



Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 1365
Location: Northern CA

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last time I was there, the docent said that Wright's mother lived in the house, contrary to the article's claim that it has no connection to him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tom



Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 2157
Location: Black Mountain, NC

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

$340,000 for a house in Oak Park sounds like a steal to me.
_________________
The foundation of the high is low
Tzu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 7785

PostPosted: Thu Jan 04, 2018 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reidy, I am certain that's correct. Geiger did some research about the property, having come across mention that Anna had lived in an adjacent house, and found out that it was 925 Chicago Ave. I believe she moved into the house and rented it for a while (to be near her boy), and then Wright bought it for her.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3265
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Again, the writing of an article seems befuddled...let me get this straight:
The just acquired house in the article is to the east of the Home and Studio at 925 Chicago Ave; the Home and Studio is at 950 Chicago Ave.; later in the article it is noted the Trust acquired a house at 931 Chicago Ave. in 1989. (931 stands between 925 and 950)

Numerically, it would seem the just acquired house IS adjacent to the Trust’s property, but it is NOT adjacent to the Home and Studio itself. When I last visited in 2012, I asked which house had been Anna Wright’s, as I did not know if her house had been to the east or south of the Home and Studio. I was told Anna’s house faced Chicago Ave. Having noticed that the house on Chicago Ave. next door to the Home and Studio was being used as an office/support building for the site, I asked if that house was Anna’s. I was told no, her house was to the east of the adjacent house and the Trust would not disclose the house number of Anna’s house as it was privately held.

1. Wright and/or his biographers inaccurately noted Anna’s house as being “next door” to Frank and Catherine’s house.
2. If Geiger was correct, this article is unclear or inaccurate about 925 not having historical connection to Wright. Possibly the reporter was trying to note Wright didn’t design the house, but chose obtuse words.
3. Are we (and Brenden Gill) being prejudiced relative to Anna “moving close to her boy”? Could there have been a symbiotic relationship in which Anna watched some of the six kids at times...or that Frank and Catherine provided some assistance to a mentally troubled relative with whom other members of the family had lost patience?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SREcklund



Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Posts: 640
Location: Redondo Beach, CA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't get it to resolve the URL properly due to all the gibberish, but if you copy the entire string below and paste it in a new browser window, you'll see a Google Street image where the Home and Studio is to the right (behind the bus), Anna's House (or not, depending on whom you believe, but already owned by the Trust and used as their offices) is in the center, and the newly purchased house (see the article for a matching picture) is at the left.

https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8943446,-87.7991512,3a,90y,186.55h,87.07t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slO989fIWL7pQUpZ6jRZnmg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
_________________
Docent, Hollyhock House - Hollywood, CA
Humble student of the Master

"Youth is a circumstance you can't do anything about. The trick is to grow up without getting old." - Frank Lloyd Wright
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 7785

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is the befuddlement: The inset photo of the white house with the porch in the article is wrong. It is between 939 Chicago (which is adjacent to the Wright property, and is the house once occupied by Anna) and 925 Chicago (the newly acquired house). So, no, there is no FLW association, as is stated in the article.

It is obvious that Anna's peripatetic lifestyle was closely associated with Frank's movements. She moved to Oak Park, because he was there. Taliesin was originally designated as a country home for Anna, seemingly in an attempt to keep the estate out of any divorce settlement with Catherine, and probably paid for with the sale of 939. There is no evidence that Anna ever resided at Taliesin, but she did move into Tanyderi at one point. Frank and sister Jane argued over her stay there, neither of them wanting her. When FLW went to Tokyo to build the Imperial, Anna followed. She was always on his heels.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 7785

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I should add one caveat: I am not entirely certain that Google always gets its street numbers correct, so if what they show as 925 is not right, the be-porched house next to the Anna Wright House may actually be the one, which would mean there is nothing wrong with the article.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forest



Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 48

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Checking the US Census:

Anna, Maginel and Jennie lived in Oak Park (then Cicero) in 1900. But no addresses are given on the census forms. FLW and family are the preceeding entry. The property is noted as owned, rather than mortgaged or rented.

Anna lived alone in Oak Park in 1910. The census form lists her address as 424 Chicago Av, but she is the next entry after FLW and his family. Perhaps Oak Park later revised the numbering scheme. The property is noted as owned, rather than mortgaged or rented.

The 1920 census has Andrew T Porter, his wife Jane, their children Anna and Franklin, and Anna L Wright at 931 Chicago Avenue. By this time FLW was in Wisconsin and Catherine lived in Chicago. The property is noted as owned, rather than mortgaged or rented.

I would say that we're looking at the same property for all 20 plus years, despite the address question, and that Anna definitely lived at 931 Chicago.


Last edited by Forest on Fri Jan 05, 2018 2:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 14867
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Forest. To be sure we read you correctly, might you edit this phrase: ". . .but she the next entry after FLW and his family." ?

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Forest



Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 48

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDR, thanks for catching that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3265
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oy.
To be clear, was Anna’s house the one currently used as an office, which is right next to FLWs garage (Ginko Tree Gift Shop)? Or, was it 925 Chicago Ave., the next house east (the house just acquired)?

If Anna’s was the house right next to the Home and Studio, it will be yet another case of the H&S staff giving out inaccurate answers to historical questions posed by me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forest



Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 48

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anna’s house was the one currently used as the offices, immediately next to the garage/bookshop. That’s 931 Chicago Avenue. It’s been a while since I last toured the property, but I recall docents identifying it as Anna’s house.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3265
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the clarification Forest...please excuse me while frown and wave a finger (not the middle one) in the general direction of a docent on Chicago Ave.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 7785

PostPosted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the Google view, you can see that the brick and wood wall along the Chicago Ave. façade of the Studio has been continued to enclose the adjacent Anna-House, leaving no doubt. But if you enter 925 Chicago Ave., Google will focus on the house past the white Victorian next to Anna.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP