EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
1924's output, per B B Pfeiffer et alia, c. 1985:
1. Project: National Life Insurance Company Office Building for A. M. Johnson, Chicago, Illinois
2. Project: Automobile Objective and Planetarium for Gordon Strong, Sugarloaf Mountain, Maryland
3. Project: Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity House, Madison, Wisconsin
4. Project: House for Mrs Samuel William Gladney, Fort Worth, Texas
5. Project: Nakoma Country Club, Madison, Wisconsin
6. Project: Nakoma Sculpture Basin, Madison, Wisconsin
This is, in fact, a choice group of projects. The last and perhaps least familiar of them is illustrated in one version in Monograph 5, p 21, while a different view of a companion design appears in Taschen II, p 158. Both
birds-eye view drawings are published in full color. They show a pair of shallow pools, round or hexagonal, each containing a human figure, placed at an intersection in the approach to the country club.
It should be noted that Alofsin, "The Lost Years" (p 293) gives a date of "around 1926" for this "Memorial Gateway" project, and shows a photo of Mr Wright's designs, modeled in the round, for the proposed figures to
be placed in the pools, facing each other across the divide. They were to be limestone erections 16 and 18 feet high, of Nakoma and her companion Nakomis (an "Indian" warrior).
described in the introduction to the 1976-1981 publication, in the Introduction by Izzo and Gubitosi, as "the third presentation of Wright's work after the
1910 exhibition in Berlin and the 1951 exhibition in Florence" (omitting several other exhibitions of the work, in New York and elsewhere ?). Further: "It
was not meant to offer a complete anthology of Wright's work, but to present its development and historical evolution."
Numerous projects (I routinely use the term expansively, to indicate both built and unbuilt work) in the various standard sources are given multiple and
varying dates. Some scholars date a work to its earliest recording on paper---a practice which Mr Wright himself would on occasion push to an unprec-
edented degree---while others are satisfied by a dating which represents the mature work, ready to be built. Who is to say which, if either, is the correct
protocol; has the SAH or another entity published a guideline on the matter ?
number ("the first two digits of which identify the year the first plan was drawn for the project") and his own dating, thus: "the date the project first took a
form fully identifiable in the final built work". . .
So, right there we have both Bruce Brooks Pfeiffer's dating of the work (or John Howe's; Storrer credits both men as providing documentation) as well as
Storrer's own take on the issue ?
Then, at the end of each Monograph volume, Pfeiffer posts this note:
And we have seen that the two-digit suffix to the file numbers as published in the '80s, in the Monographs, have grown to three-digit suffixes by the
time of the Taschen volumes of 2009, as the (published ?) sheets for certain projects grew past 99 in number. . .
Tomek was listed as 1907 for years, even in Mono 4/30-37, which was published in 1987, after owner Maya Moran had found a photograph of the house in a magazine ad from 1905. Taschen gives the 1905 date, but, considering that the house would probably not have reached the stage of being used for advertisement so quickly after being built, it could be even older.
I will take a shot at the correct decade, but won't bother being any more accurate.
The very first date given, that of Wright's birth, is false; perhaps this is the last time the year 1869 would appear in print ?
Did Mrs Wright's loyalty to her husband extend to carrying forth this vanity (or, honest error) indefinitely ?
Projects listed in "Three Quarters of a Century of Drawings" versus those found in Monographs 1 through 8:
1887-1901: "Three Quarters" = 94; Monograph 1 = 91
1902-1906: "Three Quarters" = 76; Monograph 2 = 80
1907-1913: "Three Quarters" = 99; Monograph 3 = 89
1914-1923: "Three Quarters" = 65; Monograph 4 = 61
1924-1936: "Three Quarters" = 69; Monograph 5 = 58
1937-1941: "Three Quarters" = 75; Monograph 6 = 80
1942-1950: "Three Quarters" = 162; Monograph 7 = 172
1951-1959: "Three Quarters" = 208; Monograph 8 = 226
That tallies to "Three Quarters" listing 848 built and unbuilt projects, while the Monographs contain 857---if my arithmetic is correct.