Maginel Wright Barney Cottages

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
dancedark
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:20 pm
Location: Carbondale, IL
Contact:

Maginel Wright Barney Cottages

Post by dancedark »

I read in Curtis Besinger's book, "Working With Mr. Wright" a reference to 3 cottages designed for Maginel Wright Barney probably in the summer of 1948. Does anyone have any info on them? Especially plans or elevations?
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Only one cottage design for Maginel is presented by Bruce Brooks Pfeiffer, in Monograph 7 and in Tashen III:

Image

Image

© 2009 by TASCHEN GmbH and by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation
Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

Though unbuilt, Maginel's Cottage served as the template for McCartney and Anthony, and can be perceived in Palmer and Reisley. It was also proposed for the three cottages that Lovness planned to build.
HOJO
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: Belgium

Post by HOJO »

Roderick Grant
Posts: 11815
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

HOJO, the cottage that Lovness built had nothing to do with the original scheme for three Maginels, one for each Lovness child. The Petersen version was constructed in 1976, long after FLW was out of the picture.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Roderick, is there evidence of more than one design for Maginel ?

Unlike BBP, Besinger lists Maginel Wright Barney under B.

"Summer 1949," p 202: "Mr Wright had designed three one-room cottages for his sister, Maginel Wright Barney, the previous summer. Each was based on a different geometry. The triangular one interested me the most. So I decided to try to work out a design for the [Howard] Anthonys based on this thirty-sixty design . . ."

SDR
dancedark
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:20 pm
Location: Carbondale, IL
Contact:

Post by dancedark »

Apparently, there were 3 different cottage plans for Maginel, the one shone being the C plan. Besinger references all three, but the first 2 seem to be lost to time. Anybody know anything about them?
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

How do we know that this is design C ? Where is that shown ? It's a start . . .

Besinger goes on to say that he did a design for Anthony, that Jack Howe "looked at my plan and suggested a few changes, which I made. When we showed the drawings of this plan to Mr Wright he changed the flat roof over the cooking are and carport into a pitched roof and made the hipped roof which I had drawn with equal slopes into one with unequal slopes." This was a current interest of the architect; we have already looked a Mathews and several other designs of the period with two pitches, one typically twice as steep as the other.

Then Besinger moves on to Neils. "Steve Oyakawa was assigned to work on the drawings . . ." When they were shown to Mr Wright, "he didn't sign them. Instead he revised the design. He made many changes simplifying it."

"An important change in the house was the change from a hipped roof to a gabled roof which had unequal slopes. With this change the door-height soffits at the eaves of the roof were eliminated. The roof became one simple, asymmetrically folded plane. These door-height soffits had helped to produce many characteristics of the so-called prairie houses: the intimate scale, the horizontal layering of the space, its spatial contrasts, and alse the spatial continuity between the exterior and interior of the houses. The openness of the gable and the elimination of the eave-height soffits as well as the simplification of the setting of the glass enclosure gave a new sense of openness and freedom to the occupants of this house. It also eliminated the horizontal layering of the interior space and gave it increased plasticity. But it also made problems in the structural framing of the roof. Gone was that space between soffits and roof joists in which horizontal structural members could be concealed. Any structural reinforcement of the roof -- with steel beams or channels -- now had to be handled within the roof thickness. Framing of this roof became an intriguing problem. Several of the houses at this time had this characteristic."

One would think that if the architect had a concept of how to structure this roof -- and what designer would draw something whose structure was a mystery to him ? -- but we don't hear of word from Mr Wright to his assistants, on this matter -- ever, to my recollection . . .

S
dancedark
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 4:20 pm
Location: Carbondale, IL
Contact:

Post by dancedark »

I didn't mean to say that it was specifically named "C". I just meant that, according to Besinger, it was one of 3 distinctly different designs.
SDR
Posts: 22359
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Yes -- that is interesting. One is reminded of three designs Wright made for a small kindergarten structure, in the Prairie period, each with a different roof on the same plan.

I wonder why those other Barney plans don't show up, somewhere . . .

SDR
Post Reply