EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
It does have an off "feel". I can't imagine a realtor could ethically present a house with only a virtual idealized model showing none of the actual conditions.
It doesn't seem digital to me ... I think it's a series of real photos stitched together to create the "video" presentation. The ghosting happens when the transition process isn't as smooth as one would like, or there are differences in the images (watch the placesettings change from shot to shot in the dining room and kitchen). It's effective, but a little over the top - perhaps a nice adjunct to a more traditional photographic presentation.Paul Ringstrom wrote:
The "process" is a 3D digital creation of the house because it is a video tour of a digital model, not the actual house.
Humble student of the Master
"Youth is a circumstance you can't do anything about. The trick is to grow up without getting old." - Frank Lloyd Wright
plan view, made from actual room photos and able to be navigated (so some degree) from birds-eye to perspective views of interiors -- analogous to Google
views -- is particularly ugly and unfortunate, as I see it.
like real items; there is enough irregularity in cabinetry woodgrains to suggest to me that they are not digital recreations. The earliest shots of the entry
porch show irregular tile and brick . . .
If there is proof to the contrary, I will be interested to hear it. In the meantime, the scenarios proffered by Stan and Dan make sense to me.
This house was obviously de-cluttered before the process described below.
After a little research I found that skyshots757.com was the firm that put together that presentation. They used a combination of drone photography and a fantastic 3D photo scanning process by a company called Matterport (matterport.com) which can photograph a 2,000 sf house in less than a half hour and can put together the video fly-thru and accurate b/w dimensioned 2D floor plans and the 3D floor plan visuals that are included in the video we watched, all of which can be produced and uploaded to the cloud in a matter of a few days.
Amazing and very easy to use technology that should be considered by many realtors interesting in marketing high-end properties.
This technology should be used by the FLWBC to document, for their archives, the built FLW houses.
Now if only the real-estate industry consumers of this technology cared enough about truth -- in advertising, in architectural accuracy -- to insist on more
realistic photography. This video (that address again: https://www.realtor.com/realestateandho ... 2897-44602 )
exhibits an extreme example of "wider is better" -- exactly corresponding to the auto print ads of the mid-century era, where the oval wheels and tires of
cars seen in side elevation were the dead giveaway that the vehicles were "stretched" to make them look longer and lower (itself an ideal of auto design
stretching far back in the history of the breed, apparently. Wright was right -- again ?).
The attempt to provide building plans that contain visual cues -- colors, furnishings -- that are readable by the layman, and that provides a way for each
room on that plan to be studied in detail -- is notable, if the technology is still in its infancy. This aspect of the offered technology recognizes the fact that
viewers of architecture need help in translating the floor plan into spacial reality, a problem only poorly addressed until now ?