EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Starting at the 26:00 mark, the discussion turns to Eichler's time spent at the Bazett house. A couple minutes later, Daniel Liebermann claims that Eichler originally went to Wright to design the homes. He says that Wright rebuffed Eichler. Wondering if anyone has more information about that claim?
If true, that's one monumental "what if" to consider....But I find it hard believe Wright would've just flatly turned him away.
He probably made the best decision. It might have ended up that only a handful would have been built.
The Eichler house that my parents rented for a couple of years when I was in high school, designed by A. Quincy Jones:
15 Ayala Ct, San Rafael, CA 94903
In a totally hypothetical thought exercise, I wonder if the constraints of the tract-housing model would've produced an altogether new concept from Wright. In my view, his best work came when he was under constraint (probably an unpopular opinion), which was what the Usonian was initially born from.
presented it to a new "customer" -- more than once, in a few cases -- the resulting project was a one-off, unique to the (new) client and his site.
For whatever reason, Wright's few forays into community design, with multiple dwellings, did not result in streets of Wright-designed clones.
Usonia 2 in Lansing, Michigan, which produced the Goetsch-Winckler opus, was to have been a collection of eight houses, all of them different. The
several versions of the Suntop type, a pinwheel four-plex, produced only one example, not the four units originally projected, while the Cooperative
Farmsteads for Detroit was not built, eventually appearing as a single residence, elsewhere, for the Keys family.
Usonia in Pleasantville, New York, and the Galesburg and Parkwyn Village communities in Michigan, likewise produced several houses at each location,
again each of them a unique design.
In an earlier period, Wright made a series of related designs for Arthur L Richards, the American System-Built Homes project. It was a possibility that
multiple identical units might be built in a single location, but with the exception of four neighboring duplexes and two single-story houses constructed on
a single block in Milwaukee, this never happened.
I opine that Mr Wright had little enthusiasm for the mass market -- which isn't the same thing as wishing for all Americans to live in a finer home, one
designed by a finer architect -- himself. But when the opportunity to design a series of furniture pieces to be manufactured by the Henredon company
arose in his last decade, the architect delegated the task to his apprentices, a sure sign to me that he thought little enough of the thing.
The Erdman pre-fab designs, also in Wright's final decade, were perhaps the one example of something akin to the Eichler phenomenon. I leave it to you
to compare and contrast these two examples, for what that may suggest as to why Wright turned Eichler down -- assuming the estimable Liebermann is
to be believed.
The Usonian Communities are not comparable to Eichler, nor are the Cloverleaf efforts. The Detroit Project was a dramatic departure from the usual type of development, more in the nature of the suburban/rural Broadacre. Erdman was nearby Taliesin, while Eichler was half way across the country in a state which may not have had quite the allure it once had.
http://www.eichlernetwork.com/blog/dave ... -goes-live
I think we can all agree that developers deserve disdain, generally, but Eichler surely provided an example of how well-designed homes could be built on a mass-scale. They might not be purely customized and individualistic like Wright's Usonians, but it's worth noting that Eichler built 11,000 homes while Wright built 500 buildings over his career.
I guess there's no reason to play the "what if" game, as both men made excellent contributions to the (often bleak) world of residential design. But I do wonder if Wright and Eichler had worked together (even on a compromised Wrightian vision ala Erdman) would "modern" architecture have absorbed a more "organic" approach?
He worked with A. Q. Jones (a UW Grad). What others were his go-to architects who could design for the mass market?
Wright was so into modules that I'm surprised he never developed a modular building system.
Wikipedia: Joseph Eichler used well-known architects to design both the site plans and the homes themselves. He hired the respected architect and Wright disciple of sorts Robert Anshen of Anshen & Allen to design the initial Eichlers, and the first prototypes were built in 1949. In later years, Eichler built homes that were designed by other architects including by the San Francisco firm Claude Oakland & Associates and the Los Angeles firms of Jones & Emmons, A. Quincy Jones, and Raphael Soriano.Matt wrote:What others were his go-to architects who could design for the mass market?