EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:52 am
- Location: Minne-sO-tah Norwegian living in exile in Lubbock, Texas
Engineering and construction are pretty well outside my areas of expertise, so I've always admired those who understand the processes.
Since the Duncan house was one of the Erdman Prefabs, was the process of disassembling the house less difficult than it would be for a conventional house-move? Did those who disassembled it consult with those who moved the Jackson Prefab 20 years ago? Or, was it a reverse process of putting it together from Erdman's instructions? How would one compare the complexity of this move to that of the Pope house? To what extent was the house deconstructed- was it taken down "board by board" or was it sectioned, like a conventional house would be moved?
What was the ballpark cost of deconstruction? How about the reconstruction costs?
The masonry core of the house- fireplace, kitchen/family room, etc. - was that deconstructed and moved as well, or, was it built new on the Pennsylvania site from original plans? Was anything else (aside from foundation and footings, of course) built new, or was the house a complete reconstruction?