Wright Chat

 
FAQ FAQ Register Register
Search Search Profile Profile
Memberlist Memberlist Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
Usergroups Usergroups Log in Log in

>> Return to SaveWright Home Page

Rose and Gertrude Pauson house
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 87, 88, 89, 90  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tom



Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 2316
Location: Black Mountain, NC

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool, thanks
I guess I’m thinking of catalog order as only alternative
Still, I’m surprised.
Always assumed most of the windows and doors on Wright houses were
Built on site.
_________________
Nothing lasts forever
FLLW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3585
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe the issue may be better described as the increased prevalence, as the 20th Century progressed, of standardized window sizing by larger and fewer shops, and later, by major manufacturers. Wright, for the most part, specified his window profiles, proportions, and sizes which were fabricated at local shops and brought to the site, often, but not always unglazed.

The early 20th Century "house by mail" business, aided by assembly line methods and a vast railroad network, led to standardization. Wright's ASBH's were an outgrowth of that trend, but retained Wright's unique details and proportions, though Wright did tailor his ASBH designs to interchangeability of many components between plan types. Bespoke houses by architects such as Wright became the holdouts as it were for custom windows. Wright’s work on the prefabs with Marshall Erdman was I believe his first foray into standardized windows and doors from a major manufacturer....in fact, it could be said Wright used them as a generative design element for the prefabs.


Last edited by DRN on Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:21 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tom



Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 2316
Location: Black Mountain, NC

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice, thank you
_________________
Nothing lasts forever
FLLW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 16258
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No doubt true. The Erdman II design is surely based on the size of available sash; the vertical module appears to be 2 feet, on a four-foot square grid.

The Erdman I elevations show Andersen windows (noted on the south elevation drawing) of regular size which does not accord with the building vertical module. And an anomaly occurs at the La Fond house, where the two-lite sash at the rear consists of units with
unequal-sized openings.




© 1986 A.D.A EDITA Tokyo Co., Ltd. and by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation







https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/24.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&strip=all

Perhaps that decision was made to accord with the drawn elevation while bringing the glass closer to the sloped ceiling plane ?

SDR


Last edited by SDR on Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 16258
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Erdman Prefab #2 elevations do not call out the vertical unit; an interior photo makes clear the two-foot unit.




© 2009 by TASCHEN GmbH and by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation




photo © Arthur Siegel, 1959


The very last entry in Monograph 8, the final volume, is a third proposal for Marshall Erdman. Here Mr Wright is able to bring the Prefab #2 type "down to earth" with a Model C. The two-foot vertical module is specified at left on
the elevation sheet.







© 1986 A.D.A EDITA Tokyo Co., Ltd. and by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation


Last edited by SDR on Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:01 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tom



Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 2316
Location: Black Mountain, NC

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Custom Built Pre-Fabrication" ...?
_________________
Nothing lasts forever
FLLW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 16258
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heh. Mr Wright has it both ways, with that title on both later Erdman sheets. One thinks of the advertising trope of "hand made" -- as if most objects from the hand of man could be anything other than hand-made . . .

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Matt



Joined: 25 Nov 2009
Posts: 427

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another factor in the complexity of Wrights details is that the cost of skilled labor was very cheap through the 1930s. I don't see this as an excuse to make things overly complex, but you could have complex woodworking done for a few bucks an hour in labor cost.

I have always thought Wright should have operated his own pre-fab factory. But it should have been a panel system where wall panels (some with windows) would have been factory made and trucked to a site. Wright's idea of prefab was a smaller unit module, as in the Usonian Automatics use of a block. But that really is too small a module to be an effective prefab system. Likewise, some current systems make entire rooms in the factory and truck them to the site for assembly. That, in my opinion, is too big a module. The ideal module would be a wall SIP panel, about the size of a piece of plywood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 16258
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That sounds about right. There is a photo of a wall section of a board-and-batten Usonian being removed from a truck. The issue there is that Wright's
preferred mitered vertical corner does not take kindly to being prefabricated -- unless the panel can be assembled and then mitered (on the world's largest
sliding horizontal panel saw ?) as a unit, making a perfect miter from top to bottom.

And the problem of connecting this fragile mitered corner, in the field and without excessive use of visible fasteners, remains.

It would seem that the most "honest" design for prefabrication/field assembly would acknowledge the joints rather than striving to disguise them. But this is
a philosophy of design -- at a whole-building scale, anyway -- that post-dates Wright's career, I think . . .

SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
David



Joined: 27 Sep 2016
Posts: 123
Location: Madrid, Spain

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that this thread comes up again I wanted to ask you something.

A room that I have unfinish in my model and that I would like to recreate is the master bedroom. Unfortunately I have not found any pictures of this room so my main question is about the fireplace. How do you think the design was?



In Wright's drawing it seems that the hole has a cylindrical or octagonal plan shape and next to it there is another hole, maybe a cabinet to store the firewood? Would it have doors?

On the other hand, the small window of this room that is located on the northwest facade does not appear in Wright's drawings. Maybe it was a request from the client that had to be designed at the last minute?


_________________
David Romero
www.hookedonthepast.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Tom



Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 2316
Location: Black Mountain, NC

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Never noticed that window before.
Will keep my eye open for closer shots.
It seems it might consist of triangles:
two light pointing up and one dark pointing down
_________________
Nothing lasts forever
FLLW
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 8595

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Considering the height of the cabinet next to the circular fireplace, I doubt the entire thing was meant to hold fire wood. Possibly the bottom third or so, but it is a full-height closet.

Adding a window at the last minute wouldn't be out of the ordinary, especially if it was to provide for cross-ventilation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Forest



Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 62

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt wrote:
Quote:
I have always thought Wright should have operated his own pre-fab factory. But it should have been a panel system where wall panels (some with windows) would have been factory made and trucked to a site.


Actually, the Erdman prefabs were produced as panelized wall sections as Matt described.

I'll post the information in the Erdman Prefab thread.


Last edited by Forest on Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j_f



Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@ SDR - thank you.

SDR:

Quote:
"What can you tell me about the current thinking as to student research and subsequent publication ? What is the operating ethic, as to use of prior work ? Are the traditional recorded and tacit agreements still in effect, in academia ?"



Well I would put it like this, there are some constrictions as to the nature of a source.
Sources have to be verrified, evaluated and of course most important of all, mentioned.

Evaluation follows a hierarchy. Primary sources followed by secondary sources.
Secondary sources -prior works- are naturally a good source for primary sources and a huge help in regard to
interpret the findings resulting out of such sources. All the better if secondary sources followed academic standards.
That is the extend to which prior work is used, Which goes to authorship.
Comming from a country where -in recent years - findings of plagiarism in their academic "achievements" ended political careers very publicly,
and put a negative spotlight on the universities where this happend.
Besides one´s personal standards, there is a certain strictness in regard to the issue.

Having that said, I don´t know how if that is what you understand as the traditional agreements but I would think so.


Again thank you, I will take you up on that offer if higher resolution of any of your posted content is needed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
j_f



Joined: 04 Jun 2018
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDR:

Quote:
"Of course, its possible that the drawings are intended to show only the desired forms, with the carpenter left to substitute preferable construction
detail on-site. In any event, that is likely what happened, again and again."


Quote:
"Anyway, those drawings that WJS found are really interesting. The lozenge-shaped mullion section, for instance, is a complete surprise to me. Do we
believe that's what got built ?"



Well one way or another, Ellis did build the lozenge-shaped mullions...



This picture appears to be a still from a longer version of this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDL0FGC8Vio

or at least was taken at the same day as the video was shot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 87, 88, 89, 90  Next
Page 88 of 90

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP