Dominos collection open for visitors
Oh, yes, it seems to have been the norm. Many many of the projects (I use the term for all designs, built or unbuilt, here) exist in multiple versions, presented (typically) without differentiation as to their chronology, by Mr Wright's most prominent editor, in the Monographs and the Taschen volumes, for instance.
It's the differences between versions of a single project which have the potential to teach us something about Wright's way of designing, and about the motivation to revise -- if we but knew in any given case which were the earlier drawings, and if we had some information about what drove the changes. We might assume but we don't know (I believe), whether the file numbers for individual sheets are arranged chronologically -- for a start.
I believe that W A Storrer has provided, on the whole, more information about the changes to Wright designs, and their causes, both before and after they left the boards and were constructed, than we have from any other source. I'd be interested to know if this is not the case . . .
Here is the sole information I find, in a volume of the Monographs, about the Taliesin file numbers. I don't find even this much on the subject, in the more recently published Taschen volumes.

It's the differences between versions of a single project which have the potential to teach us something about Wright's way of designing, and about the motivation to revise -- if we but knew in any given case which were the earlier drawings, and if we had some information about what drove the changes. We might assume but we don't know (I believe), whether the file numbers for individual sheets are arranged chronologically -- for a start.
I believe that W A Storrer has provided, on the whole, more information about the changes to Wright designs, and their causes, both before and after they left the boards and were constructed, than we have from any other source. I'd be interested to know if this is not the case . . .
Here is the sole information I find, in a volume of the Monographs, about the Taliesin file numbers. I don't find even this much on the subject, in the more recently published Taschen volumes.

SDR wrote:Oh, yes, it seems to have been the norm. Many many of the projects (I use the term for all designs, built or unbuilt, here) exist in multiple versions, presented (typically) without differentiation as to their chronology, by Mr Wright's most prominent editor, in the Monographs and the Taschen volumes, for instance.
It's the differences between versions of a single project which have the potential to teach us something about Wright's way of designing, and about the motivation to revise -- if we but knew in any given case which were the earlier drawings, and if we had some information about what drove the changes. We might assume but we don't know (I believe), whether the file numbers for individual sheets are arranged chronologically -- for a start.
I believe that W A Storrer has provided, on the whole, more information about the changes to Wright designs, and their causes, both before and after they left the boards and were constructed, than we have from any other source. I'd be interested to know if this is not the case . . .
Here is the sole information I find, in a volume of the Monographs, about the Taliesin file numbers. I don't find even this much on the subject, in the more recently published Taschen volumes.
I ws very excited to see BBP had included his "chronology" in the Monographs ... until I realized the listings in each year were pretty much alphabetical. Back to the drawing boards ...
Docent, Hollyhock House - Hollywood, CA
Humble student of the Master
"Youth is a circumstance you can't do anything about. The trick is to grow up without getting old." - Frank Lloyd Wright
Humble student of the Master
"Youth is a circumstance you can't do anything about. The trick is to grow up without getting old." - Frank Lloyd Wright
-
- Posts: 10537
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am
Interesting things to see at the Dominos exhibit. Remarkably inept written commentary. Wonderful models. And something new to me: a thirty-foot outdoor maquette (?) of the Golden Beacon tower:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/70832171@N07/8789907398
Oh yes -- and we lost Gunnar Birkerts this week: http://www.architecturalrecord.com/arti ... -1925-2017
SDR
https://www.flickr.com/photos/70832171@N07/8789907398
Oh yes -- and we lost Gunnar Birkerts this week: http://www.architecturalrecord.com/arti ... -1925-2017
SDR
-
- Posts: 10537
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am
-
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
- Location: Mason City, IA
SDR wrote:And something new to me: a thirty-foot outdoor maquette (?) of the Golden Beacon tower:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/70832171@N07/8789907398 SDR
This Golden Beacon tower model has been outside this building almost forever.
Owner of the G. Curtis Yelland House (1910), by Wm. Drummond
Thanks. In 1989, when David Hanks wrote his book on Monaghan's collection, the owner wrote in his preface of the idea of recreating the 1957 Golden Beacon tower. Instead, he wrote, Gunnar Birkerts designed a 30-story tower to be built as part of the Dominos headquarters. The first phase of construction, a "six-tenth-of-a-mile-long building," was completed in 1985.
Whether more than this was built I do not know. No tower exists, does it ? I have seen the architect's detailed sections of his building; I wish I could find those now, as they deliciously enlarge on some Wrightian precedent in assembling brick, stone, metal and glass to make a deluxe environment. Monaghan's personal quarters were a part of what I saw, in line form.
SDR
Whether more than this was built I do not know. No tower exists, does it ? I have seen the architect's detailed sections of his building; I wish I could find those now, as they deliciously enlarge on some Wrightian precedent in assembling brick, stone, metal and glass to make a deluxe environment. Monaghan's personal quarters were a part of what I saw, in line form.
SDR



http://www.flwright.us/FLWDominos2.htm
The actual tower was never built anywhere. Monaghan's proposal to build it in the Ann Arbor area was rejected by civic authorities.
-
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
- Location: Mason City, IA
We visited Domino Farms about a month ago on a Saturday afternoon while picking up a car in Ann Arbor. The collection was an impressive but they could use better way-finding and security. We luckily encountered another visitor who directed in the direction of the Wright pieces. There was minimal lighting (and we couldn't find anyone for assistance) and we felt that the pieces were not protected from possible theft. Perhaps there were cameras on us that we were not aware of, but that doesn't stop possible damage like was witnessed at the Wexner Center for the Arts a couple years ago when a disgruntled former employee destroyed valuable artwork.
The headquarters certainly pays homage to Wright!
The headquarters certainly pays homage to Wright!