Interpreting the Larkin ruin

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
SDR
Posts: 19682
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Interpreting the Larkin ruin

Post by SDR »

Patrick J. Mahoney, AIA, NCARB, a Buffalo, New York architect, a founding member of the Graycliff Conservancy
and its Vice-president, and a moderator here at the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy Wright Chat forum,
is responsible for the new interpretive features at the site of the former Larkin Company Administration Building.

Illustrated below are the recently-installed signage and improvements to be found there.




Image

Image

The glass structure is the phantom fence pier, built on the original foundations and part of the stone base. The inset is located on the City sidewalk (outside the fence; Larkin had another sidewalk inside the fence).
In colored concrete it graphically depicts the width of the Atrium. Another inset locates the original entrance to the admin building.




Image

Image

This panel is adjacent to the phantom fence pier and explains that the excavated area adjacent to the pier was the garden and sidewalk level of the administration building. Grade has been raise about 16 inches over the years.
The original Larkin fence base was a retaining wall that bridged the difference in height between the public sidewalk and the building grounds. Wright wanted the grade as low as possible to admit more light to the ground level of
the building. Seneca Street slopes up to accommodate the rail crossing and bridge that spans the tracks.




Image

Image

This is the final panel for this round of improvements. Note that the stainless steel stair connects the public sidewalk to a relatively new parking area, where a rail roundabout was originally located.


____________________________________________________________

SDR
Posts: 19682
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

It appears that Frank Lloyd Wright lost no opportunity to extend the form and substance of a building to the corners of its building site. This massive pier, and the brick, stone, and iron fence which extends from it to its mate on Swan Street, are major examples of this tendency in Wright's work. Indeed, three of the four corners of the Larkin building's lot were equipped with these giant bookends . . .as shown on one of the new panels.

http://www.savewright.org/wright_chat/v ... sc&start=0

SDR

Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4355
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

Who paid for this and how much did it cost?
Owner of the G. Curtis Yelland House (1910), by Wm. Drummond

pmahoney
Moderator
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:14 am

cost of interpretation

Post by pmahoney »

Different portions of the interpretation had different budgets. The streetscape (new sidewalks, pavement, irrigation, lighting etc) cost around one million for this section of Seneca St. This does not include the boilers for the heated sections of sidewalks.

The interpretive panels themselves cost about one thousand dollars to fabricate, plus the cost of their steel bases and foundations.

The phantom pier and the excavation of the Larkin Garden were budgeted around $50,000 (but I have been told the actual number is well over that)

This was all paid for by the development Company that bought the largest portion of the Larkin Factories (as opposed to another developer who operates an office conversion of a Larkin warehouse). The name of the company that paid for the pier is Seneca Larkin Holdings.

Post Reply