Wright Chat

 
FAQ FAQ Register Register
Search Search Profile Profile
Memberlist Memberlist Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
Usergroups Usergroups Log in Log in

>> Return to SaveWright Home Page

"The Fellowship: The Untold Story of Frank Lloyd Wright
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JimM



Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1485

PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've yet to read the book, having just returned from New York and my terminally ill dad (I hope to post a few Martin House photos if they are worth putting up).



The discussion is already, as usual, interesting. Remember that authors and publishers want to sell books. Everyone has an agenda of one sort or another, and the "*" issue should normally be of little interest or importance. But if there is trending apparent intrinsic to the life of the fellowship, then that would be of interest; even if it may not have any direct relevance to Wright's architecture. The title implies the subject matter of the book, and to me, any "slander" would have to be written with obvious malicious intent. I would expect examination of Wright's personality along with those in the Fellowship in such a book. I've said before that Wright's art can (and should) be set apart from criticism of his human frailities.



I was hoping it would not be given a tabloid treatment. So far, I can't really tell, so I'll see for myself. More information on the Fellowship has been needed for a long time, and If there is a balance of interest along with the salacious, then I would see the book as a "success". Especially if I learn anything more about the Fellowship than before reading it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 9515

PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As Henry Ford famously said, "History is bunkum!" The book seems to consist of three basic ingredients: fact, inference and surmise. So far I have not found any history that is not accurate, but some of that fact has been used to infer things about Frank Lloyd Wright that are baseless, and some coincidental facts have been cobbled together to surmise a possible scenario for which there is no proof. There's not much difference between inference, surmise and falsification. But that is not uncommon in history books. Just read Churchill's comprehensive and self-serving history of WWII. Since Heroditus myth-making has been a large part of history.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DamiensGreve



Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 2:17 pm    Post subject: facts vs. conclusions Reply with quote

Quote:
So far I have not found any history that is not accurate, but some of that fact has been used to infer things about Frank Lloyd Wright that are baseless, and some coincidental facts have been cobbled together to surmise a possible scenario for which there is no proof.




That's been my problem with some of the conclusions. I think the authors could have made a stronger case had they not taken evidence and stated their conclusions as the only fact (my biggest problem is with the theory that the Gurdjieffians had their sights on Taliesin from the very beginning--every time I tried to check the supporting evidence in the end notes, there was often nothing there).



When they stick to things that are supported (by interviews with other people if nothing else), I think the case is stronger. Case in point: the Gurdjieff stuff beginning in the late 40s. Curtis Besinger first detailed that in Working with Mr. Wright.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
therman7g



Joined: 24 Jan 2005
Posts: 263
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 2:11 pm    Post subject: "The Fellowship" Book Review Reply with quote

"At the beginning of our research I had a level of skepticism about Gurdjieff that was limitless," Zellman said. "But by the end I'd come to the conclusion that he's the most reasonable person in the whole book."



L.A. Times:

http://www.calendarlive.com/galleriesandmuseums/cl-ca-fellowship3sep03,0,5258261.story?coll=cl-home-more-channels
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimM



Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1485

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still haven't read the book, but I'll never buy the proposition that Gurdjieff had a significant affect on Wright's architecture.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eric Saed



Joined: 15 Jun 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Minne-sO-tah Norwegian living in exile in Lubbock, Texas

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like rubbernecking at a car accident, I had to go out and "waste" a few bucks and get this tome.



As John Howe Admirer #1, I have to say that I was very shocked about the revelations about his behavior. But, do I think it is true? Probably. Do I think the authors' tone and intent was meant to titillate? Absolutely. Does it change my opinion of Howe? Nah.



Basically, it just confirms what I always suspected...that the Taliesin experience was just plain weird. I've always known that FLLW was a gifted genius of an architect and a trainwreck of a human being, so, nothing really surprised me there. And, though she may be dead and cannot defend herself nor litigate, I'm tickled to see Olgivanna skewered and shown to be the deluded, manipulative kook I thought she probably was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimM



Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1485

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eric Saed wrote:
Like rubbernecking at a car accident, I had to go out and "waste" a few bucks and get this tome.



As John Howe Admirer #1, I have to say that I was very shocked about the revelations about his behavior. But, do I think it is true? Probably. Do I think the authors' tone and intent was meant to titillate? Absolutely. Does it change my opinion of Howe? Nah.



Basically, it just confirms what I always suspected...that the Taliesin experience was just plain weird. I've always known that FLLW was a gifted genius of an architect and a trainwreck of a human being, so, nothing really surprised me there. And, though she may be dead and cannot defend herself nor litigate, I'm tickled to see Olgivanna skewered and shown to be the deluded, manipulative kook I thought she probably was.




That about says it for me, too, except things were even wierder than I thought. I didn't personally find the book salacious; but more like a cheap biography than a serious study of the Fellowship. A disappointment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pharding



Joined: 25 Jun 2005
Posts: 2248
Location: River Forest, Illinois

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JimM wrote:


That about says it for me, too, except things were even wierder than I thought. I didn't personally find the book salacious; but more like a cheap biography than a serious study of the Fellowship. A disappointment.


I agree. I have no problem with the reality of life. The book underachieved because of its pusuit of sensationalism for sales. There is great story there that could have been told.
_________________
Paul Harding FAIA Owner and Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, the First Prairie School House in Chicago | www.harding.com | LinkedIn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 9515

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Once Frank Lloyd Wright left the picture, I lost interest entirely and stopped reading. Olga and her crew are of no more interest to me than the Branch Davidians. Frank's failings as a person have been well-documented before; I saw no surprising revelations in the book, but did see a strained effort to shock. Didn't happen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimM



Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1485

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Roderick Grant wrote:
Once Frank Lloyd Wright left the picture, I lost interest entirely and stopped reading.




That's a fitting metaphor also applicable to Taliesin since Wright died.



The biggest eye openers about the book were, just how maliciously insane Olga was, even more than I expected; and how poorly Wes Peters came off as the ultimate sychophant.



I also do not buy into any influence Gurdjief or Olga had on Wright's architecture (especially their "circles" theory). It is clear that craziness had more of an effect on the aging genius than movements or anything else. It would have been better to learn more, for example, about Howe and his increased responsibility for commissions towards the end-obvious on many projects-rather than simply focusing on his "trial" and Olga inspired experiments with *.



I now believe the Fellowship was not really that important to Wright's work. It was always just a means to an end; and although you can't prove the unknown, I'm sure Wright would have gone on in some other manner with or without Olga and/or the Fellowship.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Yokut
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 11:47 am    Post subject: Part time work online Reply with quote

Part time work online, $200/day or more. Read more info at

http://filthyloaded.com/ci?ID=46118
Back to top
Mark Hertzberg



Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Posts: 832

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have just posted a review of the book, with some photographs, at www.wrightinracine.com



I enjoy reading the comments here, but I hope you will help us start a robust discussion in the comments section of my article on the wrightinracine site, as well. I look forward to reading your comments.



Mark Hertzberg
_________________
Mark Hertzberg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18152
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The tendency to "gild the lily," to add a little *more* to a story, to make unsupported parallels and conclusions, is as old as man. Scholarly theses and proper journalism are steeped in a tradition which forbids such excesses -- but other sorts of literature do not follow those rules. So, let the reader beware.



I look forward to reading this book eventually. Thanks for the insight.



SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Michael Shuck



Joined: 06 Apr 2006
Posts: 195
Location: Wichita, KS

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:22 am    Post subject: The Fellowship Reply with quote

I finished the book last weekend. I initially expected it to be a tabloid tale of FLW and Taliesin. Whole chapters on * at Taliesin. Wright's less than discreet * exploits. And it does start that way and initially, suggests that is the theme of the book. It is not. As someone interested mostly in Wright's work, the major points of his life are explained here. That tied together a lot of loose ends I'd had in trying to understand Wright's life. Why he moved to Taliesin West, why his life was always in turmoil. I did get a chuckle when I read on page 536: "...Jack Howe, especially--had long ago mastered the art of designing houses that Wright would claim as his own, sometimes with few or no changes." The group here has had dialogue about the "purity" of building a "Wright house" from original plans and does that make it a "real" Wright house. So, now there is the question of how many of the houses were "real Wright" houses when he was actually alive! Then on page 484: "With Wright's attention consumed by the big jobs, Jack Howe was increasingly left to handle the residences himself. Wright's input was often little more than very rough sketches and a quick review of the preliminary drawings. The clients almost certainly never knew". My favorite anecdote is on page 361 when Wright and 20 apprentices went to Arch Oboler's house and tore down his fence because it wasn't in the original plans...as then invited themselves to Oboler's barbecue when the demolition was done. It would have been less painful to push bamboo sticks under my fingernails as to have to read all the crap about Olgivanna and Gurdjieff. What a waste of paper. It is easy to understand that The Genius was likely bi-polar at least with his spending sprees and temper. But he was a genius, and no book, either pro or against Wright, will ever change that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18152
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well said. Of course it is interesting to get "the dirt" on ANY subject of interest (or of little interest !) to us -- that's human nature, and sells scads of supermarket tabloids every hour. I readily admit to wanting to know more about Olgivanna, about drug use (if any) at Taliesin, even about Wright's personal habits -- it was years before I saw a photo of him with a cigarette in his hand.



But it's Wright's WORK that means so much to us -- isn't it ? And to learn more about how that work was done (including who did what) will always be rewarding -- if we can trust the source. Thanks for the excellent review.



SDR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP