EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Yes, I have thought about it since I saw the Willey website. I intend do a website eventually. The bar is set extremely high based upon Willey website. I could not match that. Right now, my priorities are to bear down on marketing for my architectural practice because we need more work in the pipeline for August and beyond, and to get the restoration substantially complete on the Davenport House so that we can move in in August. At the same time for 06, I am chair of a national knowledge community for the American Institute of Architects. I am stretched too thin right now to undertake another major project. What I can do is to bear down and take even more photographs so that I have the raw material for the website.flwright wrote:Paul,
Have you thought of making a similar website for your restoration project? The photos you have posted so far have been wonderful; it would be nice to see more photos and the project's progression laid out as nicely as the Willey's website.
Architectural historians are important and valued, but they are not architects. They lack the understanding that comes with the practice of architecture and how ideas and buildings are developed in an architectural firm. They also tend to restate many conventional ideas. They also tend to see one FLW house as being the great one with all the innovation. In reality FLW's ideas were evolutionary and built upon prior projects. When backed into a corner, for example by Mrs Willey, FLW was at his creative best. There is no doubt in my mind that that the Wiley House was the First Usonian. It is an important, historically ignored and unappreciated minor masterpiece that will hopefully get the recognition that it richly deserves.SWSinDC wrote:pharding wrote:The First Usonian.
Paul, I have to agree with you (at least with respect to non-textile block Usonians). Why, then, does Jacobs I, built two years later, get the credit?
The other thing that happens is that houses that do not photograph well because of poor maintenance or unfortunate, generally stupid alterations are ignored by historians.
grant ... As for the freeway .... having been raised in Minnesota (many years ago!) my recollection is that the only reason the Willey house exists is because of a furor over the freeway running through it and powers at be finally relenting to curve that portion around the Willey house to preserve it. While we'd all rather have the freeway gone, I'm grateful the house still exists.
phardy ... As for the first Usonian ... having done research in the Taliesin archives, I believe the Hoult house, desinged for Wichita, KS, is considered the first Usonian design. It was never built but the very similar Jacobs 1 followed shortly afterward. If you've been in the Willey house, it is more reminiscent of Taliesin (Wisconsin) than any Usonian I've been in. The Willey has a wonderful feel to it - perhaps more the hybrid between Prairie and Usonian than strictly one or the other.
And yes - the website is remarkable. I will hope to tour the house when in Minneapolis next summer.
I disagree. With FLW clean breaks are not the rule. Ideas seem to evolve and morph into the next project. If you look at Willey it is the embryonic Usonian House. Not fully refined yet, but the key elements are there. Mrs. Willey forced FLW to address a challenging budget constraint and still generate a special house. FLW responded with an incredibly innovative and creative solution. FLW was at his creative best when confronting unique challenges and a client committed to architectural excellence.Anonymous wrote:By process of elimination, FLW stated Wingspread was his last of his prarie houses. Whatever came after that was Usonian.
Anonymous wrote:By process of elimination, FLW stated Wingspread was his last of his prarie houses. Whatever came after that was Usonian.
Actually, it was perhaps the FIRST "prairie" house.... if being located anywhere that remotely resembles a prairie matters!
Defining Usonian, Prairie, etc. can be problematic, and dangerously borders on reducing Wright to style. You can't, and shouldn't try to, categorize the indefinable. There are no Wright "styles"; every design shares a relationship with the others, as well as posessing it's own uniqueness. The location of the damn fireplace was wherever it fit the design for the effect he was after.
For what it's worth, IMHO, Willey would get the nod as the first house with specific "usonian" characteristics. Hoult, Lusk, Jacobs, et al, are usonian in the context that their elements evolved into the identifiable "standard" Usonian we all know and love. Jacobs 1 simply was built at the right time and surely to primarily test Wrights current, but evolving, thoughts on affordable architecture.