Tony Smith-FLW Aprentice & Sculptor

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Wrightgeek
Posts: 1548
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Westerville, Ohio

Tony Smith-FLW Aprentice & Sculptor

Post by Wrightgeek »

I saw an article today about Tony Smith, a reasonably well-known sculptor of minimalist art in the mid-20th century.

While I am somwhat familiar with Mr. Smith's work as an artist, I was unaware that he spent time as an apprentice to FLW in the late 1930's. Does anyone here know more about Tony Smith's time at Taliesin? If so, I'd be interesed to learn more.

Here's the link to the story:

http://blueverticalstudio.com/go/?p=

Thanks.

SpringGreen
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:00 am

Tony Smith

Post by SpringGreen »

What a shocker (I've had an appreciation of his work since college, but it never occurred to me that he had any connection to FLW). I didn't believe it until I looked at the directory of Taliesin Fellowship members collected and annotated in the early '80s (that I've got access to), and his name is in there.

Looks like, from the information i am reading, that he spent 2 years at Georgetown (unknown dates), 4 years ('31-'35) with the Art Students League; '37-'38 at the New Bauhaus (that must be have been his intro to the Midwest), and was in the Fellowship for less than a year: April, 1939-Jan. 1940.

I don't know anything else because I've never gone looking for correspondence related to him since I'd never heard the connection before. I looked at Wikipedia, but that was a repeat of the blueverticalstudio page (or that page is a repeat of parts of the Wiki article).
"The building as architecture is born out of the heart of man, permanent consort to the ground, comrade to the trees, true reflection of man in the realm of his own spirit." FLLW, "Two Lectures in Architecture: in the Realm of Ideas".

pharding
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois
Contact:

Post by pharding »

I do not understand the logic of calling someone who was in the FLW program a short period of time a "Taliesin Fellow". When I was in my undergraduate architecture program, those that left without completing the coursework for the five year Bachelor of Architecture Degree were called "Dropouts".
Paul Harding FAIA Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, 1941 Lloyd Lewis House, 1952 Glore House | www.harding.com | LinkedIn

SpringGreen
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 9:00 am

Post by SpringGreen »

I don't know why they call them "fellows" either. But he was in the Fellowship.
"The building as architecture is born out of the heart of man, permanent consort to the ground, comrade to the trees, true reflection of man in the realm of his own spirit." FLLW, "Two Lectures in Architecture: in the Realm of Ideas".

MHOLUBAR
Posts: 132
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oberlin, Ohio

Post by MHOLUBAR »

Maybe he had to make a living, many in the fellowship left when they ran out of money. Their fellowship could have been considered an internship, where they had to work for the education they received and pay as well. The place ran as a commune but was already in hot enough water, so that they could not call each other 'comrade', not with McCarthy still in Wisconsin. I like the comments in the article about the architecturally based grid system with his minimal approach to materials.
mholubar

Roderick Grant
Posts: 10194
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

E. Fay Jones is another "apprentice" who stayed no more than 6 months. But since there was not curriculum in the traditional sense, how would anyone know when he had graduated?

Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

It has always seemed to me that those who stayed for a relatively short period of time and were anxious to leave and make their mark on the world were the more successful of the "fellows."

JimM
Posts: 1545
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Austin,Texas

Post by JimM »

Paul Ringstrom wrote:It has always seemed to me that those who stayed for a relatively short period of time and were anxious to leave and make their mark on the world were the more successful of the "fellows."
Couldn't agree with you more. Any true individual could never function for long in what, honestly, was a somewhat oppressive environment-except to hold out as long as possible for the opportunity to experience architectural genius. IMO, some people prefer to be led, and a longer length of time in the Fellowship actually impacted designs negatively compared to those who struck out on their own.

I also think that had Olga not been able to heavily influence Wright at a difficult time for him with her own cult experiences, things may have ended up very differently. Frank surely liked the deity he ended up being treated as, but it did not have to become more so of what Olga wanted.

DamiensGreve
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:00 am

Post by DamiensGreve »

It has always seemed to me that those who stayed for a relatively short period of time and were anxious to leave and make their mark on the world were the more successful of the "fellows."
That's the common agreement from the people I've talked to (although Lautner is the exception, what with 6 years in the Fellowship).

Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

Thanks DamiensGreve.

I knew there was at least one notable exception to my comment but I couldn't think of it at the time. Now I remember reading that fact at the recent Lautner exhibit and was shocked at the time.

I think we can agree that of all of the apprentices that became "famous" Lautner's work was the least derivative.

Speaking of derivative... I think it could be successfully argued that Wright's Usonian work was derived from Schindler's and Dow's previous work.

DavidC
Posts: 7793
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

Paul Ringstrom wrote:I think it could be successfully argued that Wright's Usonian work was derived from Schindler's.....

The more I see and learn (and very much like) about Schindler, the more I am reaching the same conclusion.


David

Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

TnGuy wrote: The more I see and learn (and very much like) about Schindler, the more I am reaching the same conclusion. -David
Alden Dow's early work is very Usonian in its principles. These houses were built using his own "unit-block" system. There is a housewalk every year in Midland, MI on the first Saturday of October where several of his houses are open. They change every year. I would highly recommend it.

I was able to get into a Dow Legacy house (not on the tour) that was built just a few years ago, for a friend of the Dow family, that was the most wonderful small Usonian that you ever could have imagined.

DavidC
Posts: 7793
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

My wife and I had the pleasure of touring the Dow home/studio a few years back - and thoroughly enjoyed it. Wonderful space in a great setting.


To me, it's more obvious to see Wright taking Usonian cues earlier (1920's) from Schindler. I'll have to learn more about the Wright-looks-to-Dow connection. Is there a "definitive" book on Dow?
Paul Ringstrom wrote:Alden Dow's early work is very Usonian in its principles. These houses were built using his own "unit-block" system.
Couldn't it be argued, though, that Wright already had a 'unit block' system prior to Dow with the California homes, which he (Wright) referred to as his "first Usonians"?


David

Paul Ringstrom
Posts: 4326
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:53 pm
Location: Mason City, IA

Post by Paul Ringstrom »

First of all a "unit-block" system does not make something Usonian.

Second Dow's block was 100% different from either of Wright's textile blocks (of which he had two distinct types: rebar joints and mortar joints).

There are only two readily available books on Dow:

Alden B. Dow: Midwestern Modern by Diane Maddex (2007)

and

Architecture of Alden B. Dow by Sidney K. Robinson (1983)

I have read the Robinson book and would recommend it. Sidney Robinson is currently an instructor at the Taliesin architecture school.

DavidC
Posts: 7793
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

What about the block system Wright employed at the Richard Lloyd Jones House (1929)? Are they substantially different from the California textiles? If so, could they then be considered more of a precursor to his (and Dow's) 'unit' usage in Usonians?

(thanks for the Dow book recommendations)


David

Post Reply