To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.
EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's
Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
I am wondering if anyone has been in the Glore house? If so, perhaps they can share their opinion?
It seems like a competitive frontrunner to today
It is a very nice house, and well situated. I have been through my fair share of flw houses. This one is my favorite. The owner was nice enough to allow tours last summer (2004).
This Old House toured the house in the spring of 2003.
But do you think this house design achieves competitiveness with the Mcmansions they are building these days? For example, are the bedrooms and bathrooms in the Glore House very large compared to other Usonians?
The main living areas are like what you might find, except the kitchen. The kitchen is large, but not central to the house. The bedrooms are a nice size, but not large. The living room and site are the best.
would it be possible to cease using the term: "McMansions"?