FOR SALE / FLlW Legacy Program House

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
RJH
Posts: 682
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Contact:

FOR SALE / FLlW Legacy Program House

Post by RJH »

This is one of only 14 from Wright's original designs since his death in 1959.

http://www.robinsonrealtors.com/FLWright

And...

More pics/details here:

http://www.robinsonrealtors.com/listing ... tID=563426

DavidC
Posts: 8121
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

Is it just me, or does this "certified legacy house" have both a mish-mash and sterile look/feel to it when compared to actual period Wright-built designs??? (the stark-white walls don't help things at all - and are there any other Wright homes with "stacked" clerestory window panes such as in this one?)


David

RJH
Posts: 682
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Contact:

Post by RJH »

If memory serves me, this design was orginally for the E. Lansing project. It should look like G-W House in terms of brick and other materials. Wright designed it for a professor. I'm sure if somone looks in the Monographs it can be seen.

Ed Jarolin
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Wyoming

Post by Ed Jarolin »

If this is a representative example of what the legacy program produced I for one am glad it is dead. A pale imitation of the Wright esthetic at best and that is being kind.

All that drywall, or it could even be real plaster, as the interior wall material. Ugh! Even within the context of this house it is easy to see how much richer the block wall areas are. And, unless my monitor is way off, the pumpkin colored version of Cherokee Red just doesn't cut it. The obvious cost cutting measure of using dropped headers in certain areas defeats the spatial flow, as shown in the photo of the tiny bedroom. Not shown in the realtor photos, but as remembered from a newspaper article of a few years ago, are the positively tiny cantilevers employed to support the deck.

I briefly meet the owners back in 2001 and they were very enthused about the project. After seeing the results here, I have to wonder if living with this has cooled their ardor and is the cause of the selling of their 'dream home' after such a short time. If so, I can certainly understand their disappointment.
Last edited by Ed Jarolin on Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Ed Jarolin
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Wyoming

stacked fretwork panels

Post by Ed Jarolin »

A quick look through various references yields Pope-Leighey, Gorden, Bachmann-Wilson and Affleck using the glazed fretwork panels in a stacked manner. At B-W this stack is still essentially a clerestory. At Gordon panels form the majority of several walls. At Pope-Leighey a vertical stack drops from clerestory height to one unit short of floor level. In the bedrooms of Affleck the stack is separated by intevening solid wall boards; 4 fretwork units with a solid between each.

pharding
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois
Contact:

Post by pharding »

One more example of why the Legacy Program is awful.
Paul Harding FAIA Restoration Architect for FLW's 1901 E. Arthur Davenport House, 1941 Lloyd Lewis House, 1952 Glore House | www.harding.com | LinkedIn

Collinst3
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Lebanon, OH

Post by Collinst3 »

Are those gutters I see? Tsk tsk tsk.
Tony Collins
___________
FLW addiction recently fed by building a wright-inspired ranch designed by former senior Taliesin Fellow.

outside in
Posts: 1272
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: chicago

Post by outside in »

Actually, there are many Wright homes with gutters, like Martin and Willits BUT the most odd aspect of this home is that they copied the chairs for the Seth Peterson Cottage, which are not Wright-designed. Either the owners were very fond of a non-Wright chair, or they made a little mistake!

Eric Saed
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:52 am
Location: Minne-sO-tah Norwegian living in exile in Lubbock, Texas

Post by Eric Saed »

:wink: Yeah, boy...that house sure is crappy. I wouldn't want to live in it at all. I sure hope someone buys it for the land and builds something sensible, like a French Colonial with a decent size master bath and a chandelier in the entryway. :roll:

DavidC
Posts: 8121
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Post by DavidC »

In some ways, it looks like they couldn't decide between having a Prairie or a Usonian - and (of course) ended up w/ neither.

A "Prair-sonian", perhaps?


Ed Jarolin - thanks for the info on the "stacked" clerestories.


David

jlesshafft
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 2:56 pm

Post by jlesshafft »

I for one, like it. Is it pure FLW - no. Is it better than 99.999% of new houses being built today - YES.

Someone mentioned the floor color...on my calibrated monitor they look correct.

Someone mentioned the drywall/plaster. I'd like to see an occasional wood clad wall, but most usonians to me are too dark with all the wood walls. I prefer a bright and light interior.

As to the chairs...would you prefer american colonial furniture? What about all the FLW houses that have Eames or other modern furniture?

As the saying goes...if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all.

Reidy
Posts: 1613
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Fremont CA

Post by Reidy »

I second the previous, and I commend the agents for not trying to pass the house off as authentic Wright as so many would.

(Just the same, all that white has got to go.)

JimM
Posts: 1568
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Austin,Texas

Post by JimM »

Ah, the dilemma of these houses. Who can deny their superiority over what's available (except for their bloated cost, and that they seem to go out of their way to make them look "track housey")?

But their direct and crass comparison to FLLW's work does not change my mind. If this was not a Legacy house, I'd advise colored walls and give deserved kudos.

SDR
Posts: 20204
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I'm in that camp on this one, I guess: call it an improved ranch house and let it go at that. It probably beats the generic suburban ranch house of fifty years ago and counting -- but I don't see how Taliesin or anyone else could mention this house and Usonian in the same breath. Perhaps the floor plan would make their point, but not to me.

The interior color is cold but the furnishings give it some life, spirit, and blessed consistency.

Frank Lloyd Light ? Would the Old Man have come down to this in his very VERY old age. . .? Let's hope not.

Tsk tsk. Real estate literature is already full-up with bogus mentions of the architect's name. For Taliesin to jump on the bandwagon seems unforgivable.

SDR

dkottum
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:52 pm
Location: Battle Lake, MN

Post by dkottum »

As it turned out, one of the faults of the Legacy Program was that it allowed three versions of an original FLLW design, with only one of these versions requiring an exact building of the original design (brought up to current code). That design was then "retired" and another could not be built. Another version allowed no changes in dimension or design, but interior adjustments could be made, such as combining bedrooms for a larger one. The last version allowed many changes. The program had no limit on the number of these modified plans that could be built.

If TA had limited the Legacy Program to unaltered FLLW plans, the outcome may have been more favorable. Many would still condem it, no matter how honestly and perfectly it was done. Some would accept it for what it is and enjoy it.

This appears to be the 1939 Newman house project for Usonia I in Michigan, that includes Goetsch-Winkler and a design for Erling Brauner. The Newman and Brauner designs were similar in design and materials to G-W. The Brauner design was modified for the original client in 1948 to have concrete block instead of brick, and a hip roof instead of a flat roof. We now have an updated version of the Newman house, also changed to concrete block and hip roof. This is not in the same league as the original concept, but nit-picking limited to the wall and ceiling color, I could be quite comfortable in it. (If it were here at Battle Lake.)

Doug Kottum, Battle Lake, MN

Post Reply