To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.
EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Most interesting. One can sometimes get the desired effect by allowing one's eyes to focus on a distant point rather than on the picture
plane; the two photos blend into one and the 3D image appears. Remember the "Magic Eye" images of a couple of decades ago ?
I wasn't able to achieve that with this photo, viewed on the screen . . .
Huh. I guess I'm seeing the above image in 3D on the phone; I'd need a couple more examples (perhaps with more extreme contrast between far and near forms ?) to be sure . . .
If you follow the images back to Flickr, each image allows you to download the full size image so you can print them out to view in a traditional stereoscope.
I have some Taliesin West, some Taliesin, some Hollyhock. Just the places I have recently (past 3 years) visited.
Reidy wrote:Yes, I'd enjoy seeing more. I was able to get the effect with an iPhone (held vertically or horizontally but not, so far, with a laptop.
If you swap the images (Left to right, right to left) you can see it on a laptop.
It is what is sometimes called 'cross viewing' vs. 'parallel viewing'.
I'm struggling to understand cross viewing vs parallel viewing. What method(s) are used in each case ? Maybe if the pairs were shown at the same size . . . ?
SDR wrote:I'm struggling to understand cross viewing vs parallel viewing. What method(s) are used in each case ? Maybe if the pairs were shown at the same size . . . ?
S
Cross viewing you simply cross your eyes until a third image forms in the middle, then 'relax' your eyes a little and the 3-D image should appear in the middle.
I think parallel works best with a viewer, I can't focus close enough anymore.
The most intense and impressive 3D viewing experience I've had, by far, was provided by a set-up I came upon at a gallery or museum
---I don't remember where. A pair of back-lighted color transparencies was visible behind a viewing mask one put one's face up to. Like any
Kodachrome slide, the color was pure and the resolution very high. The illusion of objects in space---I recall a red rose---was immediate and
stunning.