Stereoscopic images of FLW work

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
owenCollins
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:18 pm

Stereoscopic images of FLW work

Post by owenCollins »

Would people be interested in seeing some Stereo photos of Taliesin and s few other FLW works?

Example: ImageIMG_7851 by Owen Collins

They can be printed and put in an old fashioned stereoscope to view in 3d.

I have uploaded a few to flickr and can do more.
Top
SDR
Posts: 18675
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Most interesting. One can sometimes get the desired effect by allowing one's eyes to focus on a distant point rather than on the picture
plane; the two photos blend into one and the 3D image appears. Remember the "Magic Eye" images of a couple of decades ago ?

I wasn't able to achieve that with this photo, viewed on the screen . . .

S
Top
Reidy
Posts: 1563
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Fremont CA

Post by Reidy »

Yes, I'd enjoy seeing more. I was able to get the effect with an iPhone (held vertically or horizontally but not, so far, with a laptop.
Top
SDR
Posts: 18675
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Huh. I guess I'm seeing the above image in 3D on the phone; I'd need a couple more examples (perhaps with more extreme contrast between far and near forms ?) to be sure . . .

S
Top
owenCollins
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:18 pm

Post by owenCollins »

Here is another one:
ImageIMG_7895

ImageIMG_7766 by Owen Collins, on Flickr

If you follow the images back to Flickr, each image allows you to download the full size image so you can print them out to view in a traditional stereoscope.

I have some Taliesin West, some Taliesin, some Hollyhock. Just the places I have recently (past 3 years) visited.
Top
Tom
Posts: 2900
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:53 pm
Location: Black Mountain, NC

Post by Tom »

Nice shots
"taste is less important than non-conformity"
FLLW
Top
Stephen Cowdery
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:28 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:
Contact Stephen Cowdery

Post by Stephen Cowdery »

Reidy wrote:Yes, I'd enjoy seeing more. I was able to get the effect with an iPhone (held vertically or horizontally but not, so far, with a laptop.
If you swap the images (Left to right, right to left) you can see it on a laptop.
It is what is sometimes called 'cross viewing' vs. 'parallel viewing'.

Here is an example: http://yowayowacamera.com/banana/20110620112230.html
Top
LikaComet
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:08 am
Location: Lowlands of Maryland

Post by LikaComet »

It worked for me SDR. I forgot that little trick. Very effective, especially the tiger lillies in the forground.
Top
SDR
Posts: 18675
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I'm struggling to understand cross viewing vs parallel viewing. What method(s) are used in each case ? Maybe if the pairs were shown at the same size . . . ?

S
Top
Stephen Cowdery
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:28 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:
Contact Stephen Cowdery

Post by Stephen Cowdery »

SDR wrote:I'm struggling to understand cross viewing vs parallel viewing. What method(s) are used in each case ? Maybe if the pairs were shown at the same size . . . ?

S
Cross viewing you simply cross your eyes until a third image forms in the middle, then 'relax' your eyes a little and the 3-D image should appear in the middle.

I think parallel works best with a viewer, I can't focus close enough anymore.
Top
SDR
Posts: 18675
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

How does the image coalesce in parallel viewing ? Or doesn't it---that happens in the brain ?

S
Top
Stephen Cowdery
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2019 11:28 am
Location: Minnesota
Contact:
Contact Stephen Cowdery

Post by Stephen Cowdery »

SDR wrote:How does the image coalesce in parallel viewing ? Or doesn't it---that happens in the brain ?

S
All vision is ultimately in the brain, but yes.

I would think that the 3-D viewers for VR should work perfectly with the parallel images, wheras the Cross Viewing doesn't need glasses.
Top
SDR
Posts: 18675
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

The most intense and impressive 3D viewing experience I've had, by far, was provided by a set-up I came upon at a gallery or museum
---I don't remember where. A pair of back-lighted color transparencies was visible behind a viewing mask one put one's face up to. Like any
Kodachrome slide, the color was pure and the resolution very high. The illusion of objects in space---I recall a red rose---was immediate and
stunning.

S
Top
Roderick Grant
Posts: 9798
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

If cross-viewing amounts to just crossing your eyes, strabismus doesn't help one bit.
Top
SDR
Posts: 18675
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

It isn't so much a crossing of the eyes, as a focus on a distant wall rather than on the page or screen. But I suppose strabismus wouldn't help . . .

S
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Click Here for General Discussion Posts”