Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco
|Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 5:26 pm Post subject:
|Here we are again. Both items suspicious as I see it: In the first instance, would Mr Wright have advertised to a client---or indeed admitted to anyone---that he intended to have an apprentice "assist with the
design" of a project ?
In the second case, would Mr Wright have misspelled "grateful" ? Is the added date likely ? And, is the provenance card written with one of the same blue pens that we see used in some of these signatures ?
The signatures themselves need to be studied. The Ls in Lloyd are oddly careless---and as has already been mentioned, some of the signatures are too nearly identical. Assuming the Mile-High letterhead is
genuine (I've not seen it before), could it have been pilfered as a blank, to be employed later by a forger ?
Finally, was "Stacy Steadman" a '50s apprentice /